The cornea is one of the few avascular tissues present in the adult body, and the only one that can become vascularized secondarily, a process called corneal neovascularization (CNV). Because CNV compromises corneal transparency, which is essential for visual acuity and strongly selected for during evolution, it seems appropriate that control of corneal avascularity during development and adult life should be redundantly organized. It is also likely that the balance between pro- and antiangiogenic factors in the normal cornea is shifted constitutively toward inhibitors. Recent interest has focused on these natural inhibitors of angiogenesis, because they may be of therapeutic use in diseases leading to CNV and subsequent blindness.
21 24
Previous reports on the effects on developmental and postnatal angiogenesis of a deficit of a single antiangiogenic factor did not reveal spontaneous CNV in mice
(Fig. 5A) lacking angiostatin resulting from a knockout of its precursor plasminogen,
25 (B) lacking endostatin secondary to a knockout of its precursor, collagen type XVIII,
26 and (C) missing TIMP,
27 although it is not clear whether this was specifically addressed in these studies.
25 26 27 In none of these studies was the effect of the absence of antiangiogenic factors on induced CNV examined. Our results support the view that no single factor maintains corneal avascularity during development. We provide in vivo evidence that removal of one or even two important endogenous corneal antiangiogenic factors (i.e., TSP-1, -2, or both) does not result in spontaneous CNV. Together, the findings strongly support the hypothesis that corneal avascularity is regulated by multiple antiangiogenic proteins during development and postnatally.
By contrast, regulation of angiogenesis after trauma to the corneal surface with central sutures appears to be much less redundant. We demonstrate in this study that a significant increase in angiogenesis (i.e., active outgrowth of blood vessels into the normally avascular cornea) occurs in sutured corneas of TSP-1−/−, -2−/−, and -1,2−/− mice compared with their background strain. These findings establish TSP-1 and -2 as important inhibitors of inflammation-induced CNV in vivo. Because the angiogenic phenotype of the TSP-1 and -2 double-deficient mice equaled that of the TSP-1−/− mice and both had significantly greater angiogenic responses of induced corneal angiogenesis than the response of TSP-2−/− mice, we conclude that TSP-1 is more important than TSP-2 in inhibiting inflammatory (corneal) angiogenesis. However, the opposite is true for noninflammatory, developmental iris angiogenesis, because iris vessel counts in TSP-2−/− mice were significantly higher than in TSP-1−/− mice, suggesting that TSP-2 is more important in regulating developmental intraocular angiogenesis than TSP-1.
In this context, the molecular relationships of TSPs and TGFβ must be considered. TSP-1 has a unique peptide sequence that binds latent TGFβ, thereby converting it into active TGFβ.
30 31 This is pertinent because it has previously been shown that tight regulation of TGFβ expression is necessary for maintaining corneal avascularity
4 : TGFβ1-overexpressing mice display a vascularized and disorganized corneal phenotype.
4 Unlike TSP-1, TSP-2 lacks the capacity to activate latent TGFβ1 (yet to be shown in the eye),
12 and because TSP-2 has a strong effect on developmental iris angiogenesis and a weak effect on induced CNV, we conclude that this regulation is achieved by a TGFβ-independent pathway.
23
Our findings further indicate that TSPs have a more important effect on developmental and postnatal angiogenesis in the iris than in the cornea. Iris tissues from unmanipulated eyes of TSP-1
−/−, -2
−/− and -1,2
−/− mice displayed significantly increased stromal vascular density in comparison to wild-type mice. This finding is the first evidence that TSP-1 and -2 are involved in regulating developmental-postnatal angiogenesis and in controlling the degree of vascularity of ocular tissues. In line with this role of TSP-1 and -2 in developmental ocular angiogenesis, TSP-1 and -2 mRNA expression was detected in the developing murine eye from postconception day 13 (TSP-1) and day 16 (TSP-2).
30 The increase of iris vascular density in TSP
−/− mice may be due to reduced Fas-FasL–mediated apoptosis of new blood vessels in the iris, because it is known that this is one mechanism by which TSP-1 inhibits angiogenesis, and because Fas- and FasL-deficient mice display increased vascular density of certain tissues, such as the retina.
31 A role for TSP in developmental angiogenesis is not limited to eye tissues. TSP-2 deficiency has previously been shown to be associated with increased vascular density in the skin, thymus, and adipose tissue, but not in the CNS.
19 TSP-1 deficiency has also been linked to increased developmental angiogenesis in the skin
29 and to elevated intraocular vessel counts, yet it remains unclear which vessels were actually counted in the latter study.
32
TSP-1 and -2 are important inhibitors of angiogenesis (for review, see Refs.
11 12 13 ), but published reports of their roles in inflammatory CNV have been controversial. Whereas both TSP-1
16 33 and -2
15 have been shown to inhibit bFGF-induced CNV in the corneal micropocket assay (in mice or rabbit, respectively), BenEzra et al.
34 found that TSP-1 enhanced the in vivo angiogenic process induced by bFGF or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the cornea. They attributed this enhancement to the known chemotactic effect of TSP-1 on polymorphonuclear cells and macrophages.
34 Another explanation may be that binding of TSP-1 to CD47, at higher concentrations, also induces endothelial cell migration (for review, see Ref.
13 ).
We are intrigued that TSPs have a significant effect on inflammatory, but not on postnatal developmental CNV. We speculate that during development, other inhibitors compensate for the absence of TSP-1 and/or -2 in the knockout mice, and that these inhibitors are sufficient to maintain angiostasis in postnatal life, as long as trauma to the ocular surface is trivial. If, however, a postnatal angiogenic stimulus exceeds the threshold of protection provided by these other inhibitors, the absence of TSP-1, more so than TSP-2, permits induced CNV to proceed. This suggests a constitutive system of regulation that can control angiogenic stimuli up to a certain level of intensity, after which it fails. If corneal avascularity is to be maintained beyond this threshold, other factors or enhanced expression of endogenous inhibitors must intervene. We further speculate that upregulation of TSPs by inflammatory angiogenic stimuli helps to control CNV beyond this threshold. In favor of this view is the report that TSP-2
−/− mice display prolonged and intensified inflammatory and angiogenic responses in the cutaneous delayed hypersensitivity model.
35 Similarly, VEGF upregulates TSP-1 in the angiogenically stimulated retina.
36 Because we have shown that the genes for TSP-1 and -2 are constitutively active in the normal cornea, it is reasonable to expect that inflammation in the cornea further upregulates their expression, thus enhancing the negative feedback loop for angiostasis. In fact, TSP-1 has been shown to be upregulated in response to corneal injury
37 and it has recently been shown that keratocytes in the corneal stroma, in addition to TSP-1, can upregulate TSP-2 during a wound repair phenotype.
38 The fact that mRNA expression of both antiangiogenic factors at rest was significantly higher in the cornea than in iris tissue suggests that the constitutive levels of antiangiogenic factors in the cornea far exceeds their levels in vascularized ocular tissues. The only other extraocular avascular tissue, cartilage, correspondingly shows a strong immunoreactivity for TSP-2 both during development and in the adult.
39 The concept advanced here of a redundantly organized corneal angiogenic privilege with thresholds of response offers an explanation for the clinical observation that angiogenesis does not usually emerge after successful refractive surgery.
1
The authors thank Jacqueline Doherty, PhD, for general support, Jian Gu for help with histologic sectioning, and Marie Ortega and Stephanie Carol for help with breeding of TSP-deficient mice.