April 1974
Volume 13, Issue 4
Free
Articles  |   April 1974
An Evaluation of the Pilocarpine Ocusert
Author Affiliations
  • DAVID M. WORTHEN
    Veterans Administration Hospital, Gainesville, the University of Florida Department of Ophthalmology, Gainesville, and the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Fla.
  • THOM J. ZIMMERMAN
    Veterans Administration Hospital, Gainesville, the University of Florida Department of Ophthalmology, Gainesville, and the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Fla.
  • CHIEL A. WIND
    Veterans Administration Hospital, Gainesville, the University of Florida Department of Ophthalmology, Gainesville, and the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Fla.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 1974, Vol.13, 296-299. doi:
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      DAVID M. WORTHEN, THOM J. ZIMMERMAN, CHIEL A. WIND; An Evaluation of the Pilocarpine Ocusert. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1974;13(4):296-299.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.
Abstract

Forty patients with open-angle glaucoma who were responsive to pilocarpine have been studied for up to eight months regarding their response to the use of the pilocarpine Ocusert with a delivery rate of 20 micrograms per hour. Using pilocarpine drops, the 40 patients had a mean intraocular pressure of 20.7 plus or minus 8.6 mm. Hg. When the pilocarpine was discontinued their pressure rose to a mean of 25.6 plus or minus 5.6 mm. Hg. Using a pilocarpine Ocusert, mean pressure was reduced to 19.9 plus or minus 3.9 mm. Hg on both a short- and long-term basis. The reduction in pressure with use of the Ocusert is significant with a p-value of less than 0.01. Subjectively, the patients responded that they preferred the Ocusert system to pilocarpine drops. No side effects from the Ocusert have been noted.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×