In the present analysis, only the baseline nondiabetic participants who received FPG evaluation in 2008 and had a total of 3 or more FPG measurements were included. Long-term FPG level was assessed as the mean of annual FPG measurements. Intraindividual longitudinal trend of FPG was assessed as the linear regression slope of FPG levels across each time point of FPG examination (recorded as year to date), and FPG fluctuation was measured as the standard deviation (SD-FPG) and root mean square error (RMSE-FPG) of visit-to-visit FPG levels.
The 1-way ANOVA was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous variables and the χ2 test for comparison of frequencies.
The associations of retinal vascular caliber with long-term mean FPG level, longitudinal FPG trend, and FPG fluctuation were examined using univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses. In univariate analyses, variables with a P value of < 0.1 in association with retinal vascular caliber were considered potential risk factors and, thus, were included in multivariable analysis. The adjustment on the fellow calibers on the same eye (such as CRVE adjusting for CRAE and CRAE adjusting for CRVE) were used as a proxy for immeasurable variables that may be potential confounding factors, such as blood volume, genetic factors, body size, and magnification factors. The associations of long-term mean FPG level, longitudinal FPG trend, and fluctuation with retinal vascular caliber were explored in three models: unadjusted model, Model 1, and Model 2. Variables adjusted in Model 1 include age, sex, BMI, MAP, TG, LDL-c, HDL-c, and fellow vascular caliber at the follow-up examination in 2012 for the association with mean FPG level, and baseline FPG in addition for the associations with FPG trend and fluctuation. Model 2 further adjusted for factors including antihypertensive medicine use, cigarette smoking, dietary preference, physical activity, and sedentary behavior on the basis of Model 1. Standardized regression coefficients were adopted for assessing explanatory power of variables in the multivariate models.
All statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 12.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA), and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.