Moreover, the increase in ROCK activity was not observed in other retinal layers, implying that this response to axonal lesions is specific to RGCs. However, we had difficulty at first finding evidence directly indicating which oxidative stress pathway was suppressed by the ROCK inhibitor K-115.
Figure 3 shows our assessment of the ability of ROCK inhibitors to directly suppress oxidative stress. The antioxidant effect of K-115 was significantly lower than that of BHT. This suggests that K-115 did not act as an antioxidant reagent in this system, and led us to believe that ROCK inhibitors increase antioxidant activity through another mechanism. Looking to test this hypothesis, we assessed the gene expression pattern after NC of the Nox family, including
Nox1,
2,
3, and
4, with K-115 treatment. Previously, it was reported that the Nox family is expressed downstream of ROCK activity,
22,81,82,96 and indeed, we did find that the expression of
Nox1,
2, and
4 increased after NC, particularly
Nox1 and
2 in the RGCs. Previous findings that Nox1, 2, and 4 were expressed in surviving RGCs, and that RGCs had a significantly higher level of Nox1 than other members of the Nox family,
96 support our results. It has also been reported that
Nox2 is particularly expressed in the microglial cells.
97,98 The final results of the experiments reported here showed that only
Nox1 was suppressed after NC with K-115 treatment. This decrease in
Nox1 expression after K-115 treatment supported our hypothesis. Indeed, Nox1 was found to play a critical role in ischemia-induced oxidative stress and RGC death in experiments using the Nox inhibitor VAS2870.
96 Furthermore, since K-115 also significantly inhibits RGC death in ischemia-reperfusion models (Mizuno K, et al.
IOVS 2007;48:ARVO E-Abstract 4805), this protective effect might have a similar mechanism that modulates Nox family expression.