April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Full Thickness Macular Hole Development After Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Charles Clifton Wykoff
    Retina Consultants of Houston, Houston, TX
    Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
  • Daniel Croft
    Retina Consultants of Houston, Houston, TX
  • Eric Chen
    Retina Consultants of Houston, Houston, TX
    Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
  • Tien P Wong
    Retina Consultants of Houston, Houston, TX
    Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
  • David M Brown
    Retina Consultants of Houston, Houston, TX
    Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Charles Wykoff, None; Daniel Croft, None; Eric Chen, None; Tien Wong, None; David Brown, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 1080. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Charles Clifton Wykoff, Daniel Croft, Eric Chen, Tien P Wong, David M Brown; Full Thickness Macular Hole Development After Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):1080.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

To report a series of patients who developed a full thickness macular hole (MH) following primary repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD).

 
Methods
 

Retrospective review of the demographic, clinical, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and surgical data of patients who underwent RD repair and subsequently developed MH between 1/1/2000 and 5/1/2013.

 
Results
 

Seven eyes (3 left and 4 right) from 4 women and 3 men (mean age 62 years, range 52-71 years) which developed MH after primary RD repair were identified. Surgical RD repair was performed with scleral buckling (SB) alone in 3 patients, pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) alone in 2 patients, and both SB and PPV in 2 patients. The mean interval between RD surgery and MH diagnosis was 278 days (range, 28-1,203 days), with 4 eyes developing MH in less than 70 days. At the time of MH diagnosis, an epiretinal membrane (ERM) was observed within the macula in all cases. All 7 patients underwent PPV with internal limiting membrane peeling and all experienced successful MH closure. Last clinical evaluation was performed a mean of 527 days (range 43-2,034 days) after MH surgery. The mean logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) (approximate Snellen equivalent) was 1.75 (counting fingers at 5 feet), 1.0 (20/200), 1.31 (20/400), and 0.74 (20/100) at RD presentation, after RD repair, at MH diagnosis, and at last follow-up, respectively. Statistically significant visual improvements were observed after both primary RD repair (P=0.01) and after MH closure (P=0.01).

 
Conclusions
 

MH may develop following primary RD repair with SB, PPV, or both. In this series of 7 eyes, ERM was associated with all MH cases. All 7 MH were successfully closed with PPV and ILM peeling. Significant visual gain was observed after both primary RD repair as well as subsequent MH closure.

 
Keywords: 586 macular holes • 697 retinal detachment • 762 vitreoretinal surgery  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×