April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
The effect of different body position on intraocular pressure and its relationship to ocular and systemic factors in healthy subjects
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jie Hao
    Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Yi Zhen
    Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Sizhen Li
    Aier Ophthalmology Hospital, Nanjing, China
  • Hao Wang
    Xingtai Hospital, Xingtai, China
  • Ningli Wang
    Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Jie Hao, None; Yi Zhen, None; Sizhen Li, None; Hao Wang, None; Ningli Wang, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 115. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jie Hao, Yi Zhen, Sizhen Li, Hao Wang, Ningli Wang; The effect of different body position on intraocular pressure and its relationship to ocular and systemic factors in healthy subjects. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):115.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the posture change on intraocular pressure (IOP) and analysis the relationship to ocular and systemic factors in healthy subjects.

Methods: Forty-one healthy subjects were included, 26 females and 15males. The underlying ocular and systemic factors were taken before the IOP measurement, such as objective refractive status, height, weight and blood pressure. Accupen was used in both eyes of each subject. From 5:30pm to 7:30pm, IOP was measured in a random order of sitting, supine, right lateral and left lateral position. Each position was maintained at least 5 minutes. Wilcox on signed-rank test was used to compare IOP alterations. Pearson’s correlation analyses its relationship to ocular and systemic factors. P values of less than 0.05 were considered to be significant.

Results: The mean age was 49.17±9.72 years old. And the CCT was 540.59±28.07um in right eye and 543.76±28.27um in left. No significant difference was found between right and left eye in IOP of different position and the IOP changes(P>0.05).Hence, the right eyes were evaluated only to illustrate our observations. The IOP increased significantly from sitting to supine(11.30±2.63mmHg& 12.44±3.27 mmHg, P<0.001). Compared with supine position, the dependent eye (14.32±3.25 mmHg, right lateral position) and non-dependent eye(13.70±2.71 mmHg, left lateral position) increased significantly. The IOP change between sitting and right lateral position was up to 3.01±2.73 mmHg(P<0.0001). In Pearson’s analysis, positive correlation was found between age and IOP change( supine-right lateral, sitting-right lateral position),and IOP in right lateral position(r=0.389,P<0.05 ; r=0.475, P<0.05; r=0.513,P<0.001).No correlation was found between age and IOP in sitting and supine, as well as the IOP change of sitting-supine( P>0.05 ).There were no correlations between different body position IOP and BMI(weight /height 2), refractive status, as well as systolic and diastolic blood pressure(P>0.05).

Conclusions: IOP was gradually increased in the order of sitting, supine, lateral position. And with the age increasing, the IOP change regard to lateral position enlarged.

Keywords: 568 intraocular pressure  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×