April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Swelling and dimpling of inner reTinal lAyer after internal lImiting membraNe peeling: multimodal assessment. STAIN study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sebastien Guigou
    CH Henri Duffaut, Avignon, France
    P 1,5, Mougins, France
  • Stephan Pommier
    P 1,5, Mougins, France
  • Pierre Yves Merite
    P 1,5, Mougins, France
  • Hervé Rouhette
    P 1,5, Mougins, France
  • Franck Meyer
    P 1,5, Mougins, France
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Sebastien Guigou, None; Stephan Pommier, None; Pierre Yves Merite, None; Hervé Rouhette, None; Franck Meyer, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 1153. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sebastien Guigou, Stephan Pommier, Pierre Yves Merite, Hervé Rouhette, Franck Meyer; Swelling and dimpling of inner reTinal lAyer after internal lImiting membraNe peeling: multimodal assessment. STAIN study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):1153.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: To investigate the inner retinal layer outcome after internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in idiopathic epiretinal macular membrane (ERM) with new Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD OCT)

Methods: Prospective, multicentric, comparative study. Vitrectomy and ERM removal were performed using brilliant peel staining before and after ILM peeling. All eyes were examinated pre and postoperatively (W1, M1, M3, M6) using Spectralis HRA (Heidelberg) with autofluorescence, red free, infrared filters and SD OCT with B-scan and C-scan images. Videos of the surgeries are retrospectively analyzed

Results: 41 patients with ERM underwent pars plana vitrectomy with (group B, n= 24) or without (group A, n= 17) ILM peeling associated. The gain of BCVA at M6 was the same (+10 ETDRS letters) between the 2 groups but recovery was slower in the group B, p<0,05. The decrease of the CRT (-75 µm at M6) was the same between the 2 groups, p<0,05. In the group B a dissociated optic nerve fiber layer (DONFL) appearance was detected in 16 eyes (63%), p<0,05. Dimples of the nerve fiber layer are seen in 20 eyes (95%) which correspond to the DONFL appearance, p<0,05. It appears at M1 visit and persists until M6 and was never seen in the non-ILM peeled group. En face OCT shows a dimpling of the inner retinal layer which correspond to the area of the ILM peeling. Swelling of the arcuate nerve fiber layer (SANFL) was detected in 15/24 eyes in the ILM peeled group and in 5/14 eyes in the non ILM peeled group, M3 p<0,05. It appears at W1 and regress at M3 visit with atrophy. Autofluorescence imaging shows a dark point at the beginning of the arcuate striae and correspond to the initiated peeling with the forceps on the video.

Conclusions: Multimodal examination (HRA and SD OCT) allows us to describe two different ways of healing after ILM removal. SD OCT is more sensitive than Red free photography to detect DONFL appearance which correspond actually to dimples in the inner retina. Autofluorescence and infrared photography show transient SANFL which probably correspond to a direct traumatism when peeling. Thus, peeling ILM in the temporal inferior area, use staining or atraumatic forceps may be the best ways to begin the surgery and avoid microscotoma

Keywords: 762 vitreoretinal surgery  

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.