April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Clinical Presentation and Causes of Recurrent Corneal Erosion Syndrome - A Review of 100 Patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Juan A Duran
    Instituto de Oftalmologia, Basque Country University, Vizcaya, Spain
  • Arturo E Grau
    Instituto de Oftalmologia, Basque Country University, Vizcaya, Spain
  • Eugenia Abusleme
    Instituto de Oftalmologia, Basque Country University, Vizcaya, Spain
  • Elio Diez-Feijoo
    Instituto de Oftalmologia, Basque Country University, Vizcaya, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Juan Duran, None; Arturo Grau, None; Eugenia Abusleme, None; Elio Diez-Feijoo, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 1504. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Juan A Duran, Arturo E Grau, Eugenia Abusleme, Elio Diez-Feijoo; Clinical Presentation and Causes of Recurrent Corneal Erosion Syndrome - A Review of 100 Patients. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):1504.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To study the clinical findings and the risk factors for Recurrent Corneal Erosion Syndrome (RCES).

Methods: We have examined a total of 100 patients (117 eyes) with the diagnosis of RCES at the ICQO Ophthalmological Institute (Bilbao, Spain). Studied data included demography, etiology, area of corneal damage and association with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD).

Results: The mean age of patients was 44.5 years (range 14-80). Attributed causes of RCES were: minor trauma (46 eyes, 39.3%), epithelial basement membrane corneal dystrophy (20 eyes, 17.1%), photorefractive keratectomy PRK (20 eyes, 17.1%), Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis LASIK (9 eyes, 7.7%) and of unknown origin (22 eyes, 18.8%). The most frequent site of RCES was the inferior paracentral cornea (50%), followed by the upper cornea (15%) and widespread location (15%). An association with MGD was found in 59% of patients.

Conclusions: RCES may have various etiologies, which explains the variety in the clinical presentation of the disorder. Interestingly, a significant number of RCES patients initiate the symptoms of RCES following keratorefractive surgery, and a high percentage of patients also present with MGD. These findings cannot be explained on the basis of our current understanding of the physiopathology of RCES.

Keywords: 479 cornea: clinical science • 482 cornea: epithelium • 765 wound healing  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×