April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Visual profile of Australian Indigenous children.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Shelley Hopkins
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia
  • Geoff Sampson
    Optometry, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
  • Peter Hendicott
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia
  • Joanne M Wood
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Shelley Hopkins, None; Geoff Sampson, None; Peter Hendicott, None; Joanne Wood, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 156. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Shelley Hopkins, Geoff Sampson, Peter Hendicott, Joanne M Wood; Visual profile of Australian Indigenous children.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):156.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

Little is known about the prevalence of refractive error, accommodative vergence disorders or delayed visual information processing skills in Australian Indigenous children. This is potentially relevant to the reduced reading performance of Australian Indigenous children given the association of these visual conditions with reduced academic outcomes in the wider population. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of these paediatric visual conditions and their association with reading outcomes in Australian Indigenous children.

 
Methods
 

Vision testing was performed on 595 Indigenous and non-Indigenous primary school children aged 6 - 13 years in Queensland, Australia. Vision parameters measured included visual acuity, refractive error, near point of convergence, horizontal heterophoria, fusional vergence range, visual motor integration (Beery test) and rapid automatised naming (Developmental Eye Movement test). Measures of reading accuracy and reading comprehension were also acquired using the Neale reading test. The prevalence of a range of visual conditions was compared between Indigenous and non-Indigenous children and associations between the visual conditions and reading performance were assessed.

 
Results
 

While refractive error (Indigenous: 10%, non-Indigenous: 16%, p = 0.04) was less common, convergence insufficiency was twice as prevalent in Indigenous children compared with non-Indigenous children (Indigenous: 10%, non-Indigenous: 5%, p = 0.04). Reduced visual motor integration (Indigenous: 28%, non-Indigenous: 16%, p < 0.01) and rapid automatised naming skills (Indigenous: 67%, non-Indigenous: 59%, p = 0.04) were also more common in Indigenous children. Reduced visual motor integration and rapid automatised naming skills were significantly associated with poorer reading outcomes in both Indigenous and non-Indigenous children (Indigenous and non-Indigenous: p < 0.01).

 
Conclusions
 

This study is the first to assess refractive error, convergence insufficiency, visual motor integration and rapid automatised naming in Australian Indigenous children. Refractive error is less common in Indigenous children, however, there is more convergence insufficiency and poorer outcomes on two visual information processing parameters in this group. This is an important finding given the association between the latter conditions and reduced reading outcomes, in light of known poorer reading outcomes in Australian Indigenous children.

  
Keywords: 547 hyperopia • 434 binocular vision/stereopsis • 672 reading  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×