April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Common mechanisms underlying intraocular pressure identified in functional analysis of gene lists from genome-wide association study results in IGGC cohorts
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Cristina Venturini
    DTR, KCL, London, United Kingdom
    Institute of Ophthalmology, UCL, London, United Kingdom
  • Jamie E Craig
    Department of Ophthalmology, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
  • Norbert Pfeiffer
    Department of Ophthalmology, Johannes Gutemberg University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany
  • Cornelia M van Duijn
    Department of Epidemiology and Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • Janey L Wiggs
    Department of Ophthalmology Mass Eye & Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA
  • Tin Aung
    Eye Research Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
  • David A Mackey
    Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, SA, Australia
    Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Lions Eye Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
  • Ananth C Viswanathan
    Institute of Ophthalmology, UCL, London, United Kingdom
  • Christopher J Hammond
    DTR, KCL, London, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Cristina Venturini, None; Jamie Craig, None; Norbert Pfeiffer, Alcon (F), Allergan (F), Bausch&Lomb (F), Bayer (F), Boehringer-Ingelheim (F), Carl Zeiss Meditech (F), Chibret (F), Heildelberg Engineering (F), Invantis Inc (F), Invantis Inc (R), MSD (F), MSD (R), Nidek (F), Novartis (F), Novartis (R), Pfizer (F), Santen (R), Sensimed (F), Sensimed (R), Topcon (F); Cornelia van Duijn, None; Janey Wiggs, None; Tin Aung, Alcon (C), Alcon (F), Alcon (R), Allergan (C), Allergan (R), Carl Zeiss Meditec (R), Ellex (F), Ellex (R), Santen (R); David Mackey, None; Ananth Viswanathan, None; Christopher Hammond, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 1662. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Cristina Venturini, Jamie E Craig, Norbert Pfeiffer, Cornelia M van Duijn, Janey L Wiggs, Tin Aung, David A Mackey, Ananth C Viswanathan, Christopher J Hammond, Internatiol Glaucoma Genetics Consortium- IGGC; Common mechanisms underlying intraocular pressure identified in functional analysis of gene lists from genome-wide association study results in IGGC cohorts. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):1662.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: Intraocular pressure is the main risk factor for glaucoma. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS), even when well powered, typically identify few genes, responsible for a fraction of heritability. Yet, under a plurigenic model for complex disease, many more loci are expected to lie undetected below the formal GWAS significance thresholds, due to their low effect sizes and perhaps across cohort genetic and environmental heterogeneity. A significant number among them are expected to share functional commonalities that may be possible to capture in existing functional annotation categories. The aim of the study is to explore the functional annotation categories over-represented in the genetic association profiles for intraocular pressure in the general populations.

Methods: This study is a meta-analysis of Gene Ontology enrichment analyses performed on GWAS results of twelve Caucasian independent cohorts (N=25847) and four Asians cohorts (N=7761) part of the International Genetics Glaucoma Consortium. Genes were assigned a significance level equal to the best associated SNP within 100kb of the transcript and the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) was used to identify sets of genes overrepresented in each of the cohorts. Fisher’s combined probability method was used for the meta-analysis.

Results: Groups of genes enriched at very significant statistical levels were consistent across cohorts. These results suggest that genes involved in biological and cell adhesion (P= 1.91x10-20 and P= 1.43x10-19 respectively), located in the plasma membrane (P= 9.76x10-18) or, cellular junction (P= 2.68x10-15) and involved in calcium ion binding (P= 6.56x10-20) were significantly overrepresented in relation to intraocular pressure. These results were replicated in the Asian cohorts (biological and cell adhesion: P= 1.39x10-04 and P= 1.47x10-04; plasma membrane: P= 2.34x10-08; cell junction: P= 1.91x10-05; calcium ion binding P= 1.23x10-04).

Conclusions: These findings provide evidence that intraocular pressure in the general population is related to plasma membrane adhesion. This may have implications for prioritization work in future gene discovery analyses.

Keywords: 539 genetics • 568 intraocular pressure  

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.