April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Impact of summer follow-up interruption on functional and anatomical results over the course of Ranibizumab treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • ora levy
    Ophthalmology, APHP Hopital Avicenne, Bobigny, France
  • Franck Fajnkuchen
    Ophthalmology, APHP Hopital Avicenne, Bobigny, France
  • Benjamin Penaud
    Ophthalmology, APHP Hopital Avicenne, Bobigny, France
  • Gilles Chaine
    Ophthalmology, APHP Hopital Avicenne, Bobigny, France
  • Audrey Giocanti-Auregan
    Ophthalmology, APHP Hopital Avicenne, Bobigny, France
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships ora levy, None; Franck Fajnkuchen, None; Benjamin Penaud, None; Gilles Chaine, None; Audrey Giocanti-Auregan, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 1774. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      ora levy, Franck Fajnkuchen, Benjamin Penaud, Gilles Chaine, Audrey Giocanti-Auregan; Impact of summer follow-up interruption on functional and anatomical results over the course of Ranibizumab treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):1774.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Ranibizumab Intravitreal injections (IVT) improve Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) and lower Central Foveal Thickness (CFT) in Diabetic Macular Edema (DME). This treatment requires a monthly follow-up. Nevertheless, a long period of follow-up interruption can occur during summer break. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether this period actually impacts on BCVA and CFT over the course of DME treatment.

Methods: We included in a retrospective fashion all patients with DME over the course of Ranibizumab injections from April to October 2013 with good anatomical and functional results after 3 initial IVT followed by a pro re nata strategy. We have included all patients who were neither followed nor injected during at least 7 consecutive weeks. 2 outcomes were assessed : BCVA (ETDRS scale) and CFT on spectral domain OCT, (OPKO, Optos, Dunfermline, Scotland) before and after the break.

Results: We have included 12 eyes of 11 patients (6 women, 5 men) who stopped their follow-up for at least 7 weeks. Mean age was 61.8 years, mean duration of break was 12 weeks (from 7.1 to 26 weeks). Patients underwent an average of 4 IVT and were treated for 5.7 months before the summer break. All patients came back to follow-up after the break. When the patients were back to follow-up, mean decrease in BCVA was -3.6 letters (from +8 to -22 letters) and mean increase in CFT was +209 microns (from -200µm to +920 µm).

Conclusions: 3 months of break in follow-up generally due to summer holiday, does not seem to have irreversible consequences on functional results in DME treatment. In this case series, the break of follow-up has widely increased CFT while it did not significantly impact BCVA. This fact underlines the weak correlation between anatomical and functional results over the course of DME treatment.

Keywords: 499 diabetic retinopathy • 505 edema  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×