April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Positive impact of Comprehensive Vision Rehabilitation on psychosocial well-being
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Alexandra Selivanova
    Vision Rehabilitation, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA
  • Mary Lou Jackson
    Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Alexandra Selivanova, None; Mary Lou Jackson, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 188. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Alexandra Selivanova, Mary Lou Jackson; Positive impact of Comprehensive Vision Rehabilitation on psychosocial well-being. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):188.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: To assess patient-reported outcomes pre- and post-multidisciplinary rehabilitation.

Methods: Subjects completed the National Eye Institute Vision Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) pre- and post-rehabilitation. Comprehensive Vision Rehabilitation included vision rehabilitation consultation, occupational therapy training and acquisition of devices. Visual assessment included visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity (CS) and central visual field. Patient characteristics included living situation, medications being taken and time spent with an occupational therapist (OT).

Results: 39 subjects were enrolled. Mean (SD) age was 70±19 years, 51% had macula disease and 56% were female. In the better eye, mean VA was 0.47±0.37 LogMAR and mean CS was 1.23±0.39 log measured with Pelli-Robson chart. With 100 being the best score, the NEI VFQ-25 vision specific subscales for mental health symptoms and dependency were low (43 and 55) pre-rehabilitation, but significantly improved (53 and 65) post-rehabilitation (P = 0.01 and P = 0.03). After adjusting for age, gender and vision, only improvement in the mental health subscale remained significant (P = 0.02). Most patients (87%) lived independently in the community: alone, with a spouse or with children. The dependency and role difficulty subscales were significantly associated with living with children (P = 0.02 and P = 0.03). Following adjustments, no significant associations were found for number of medications being taken or time spent with an OT.

Conclusions: Vision loss impacts well-being and these findings support that vision rehabilitation likely plays an important role in reducing mental health symptoms. Limitations of results include small sample size, selection bias and lack of controls; however, given that psychosocial well-being is impacted by vision loss, positive impact on this domain by Comprehensive Vision Rehabilitation is an important clinical observation. Future study can identify which components of vision rehabilitation or patient characteristics correlate with change in patient reported mental health.

Keywords: 462 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: outcomes/complications • 584 low vision • 669 quality of life  

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.