April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Single Versus Multiple Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Glaucoma Surgical Trials
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Mingjuan Lisa Zhang
    Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • Brian Chon
    Duke University, Durham, NC
  • Jiangxia Wang
    Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
  • Gerard Smits
    Transcend Medical, Menlo Park, CA
  • Shan C Lin
    University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • Tsontcho Ianchulev
    University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • Henry D Jampel
    Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, MD
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Mingjuan Zhang, None; Brian Chon, Transcend Medical (F); Jiangxia Wang, None; Gerard Smits, Transcend Medical (C); Shan Lin, None; Tsontcho Ianchulev, Transcend Medical (E); Henry Jampel, Transcend Medical (C)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 2166. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mingjuan Lisa Zhang, Brian Chon, Jiangxia Wang, Gerard Smits, Shan C Lin, Tsontcho Ianchulev, Henry D Jampel; Single Versus Multiple Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Glaucoma Surgical Trials. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):2166.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: Little is known about the necessity of multiple same-day intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements versus a single measurement in describing the effect of IOP-lowering surgical procedures, and such evidence could affect surgical trial recruitment and retention.

Methods: 609 patients (609 eyes) with primary open-angle glaucoma and cataract from the pre-randomization phase of the COMPASS CyPass Micro-Stent randomized controlled trial underwent one IOP measurement while taking usual medications to lower IOP and three diurnal IOP measurements at 8am, 12pm, and 4pm after undergoing a 2-4 week washout of all IOP-lowering drops. The main outcome was the proportion of eyes in which the increase in IOP after washout, using the mean of the three measurements, differed by more than 0.5, 1, 1.5, or 2mmHg from the increase in IOP after washout using only one of the after-washout measurements. A proportion of ≤10% at the 1.5mmHg cutoff was considered clinically acceptable.

Results: The mean IOP before washout was 18.5±4.0mmHg. The mean increase in IOP after washout using the mean of the three measurements was 5.3±4.2mmHg. The percentage of eyes in which the increase in IOP using a single after-washout IOP differed from the increase in IOP using the mean of three measurements by more than 1.5 mmHg was 35%, 26%, 34%, 30%, and 31% when the single measurement was made at 8am, 12pm, 4pm, a randomly chosen one of the three times, and the time closest to that of the before-washout IOP, respectively. By logistic regression, the 12pm after-washout IOP had the lowest proportion of eyes differing from the mean (p<0.001) and thus most closely approximated the mean diurnal IOP measurement.

Conclusions: Although eliminating multiple IOP measurements would simplify the conduct of surgical trials in glaucoma, our data show that using a single IOP measurement after washout does not adequately approximate the mean of multiple IOP measurements. Further evaluation is needed after the COMPASS trial is complete to determine whether single IOP measurements might have applicability for post-surgical IOP characterization.

Keywords: 568 intraocular pressure • 466 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: treatment/prevention assessment/controlled clinical trials  

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.