April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
A Comparison of Same-Setting versus Delayed Vitrectomy in the Management of Retained Lens Fragments Following Cataract Surgery
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Steven J. Ryder
    Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
  • Anton Orlin
    Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
  • George J Parlitsis
    Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
  • Ya-Lin Chiu
    Publich Health, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
  • Donald J D'Amico
    Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
  • Robison Vernon Paul Chan
    Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
  • Szilard Kiss
    Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Steven Ryder, None; Anton Orlin, None; George Parlitsis, None; Ya-Lin Chiu, None; Donald D'Amico, None; Robison Chan, None; Szilard Kiss, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 2343. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Steven J. Ryder, Anton Orlin, George J Parlitsis, Ya-Lin Chiu, Donald J D'Amico, Robison Vernon Paul Chan, Szilard Kiss; A Comparison of Same-Setting versus Delayed Vitrectomy in the Management of Retained Lens Fragments Following Cataract Surgery. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):2343.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Intravitreal retained lens fragments (RLF) are a rare but potentially serious complication of phacoemulsification. The purpose of our study is to compare same setting ("no wait") vitrectomy to delayed surgery in the management of RLF in as single academic setting.

Methods: Retrospective, non randomized study of all patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for RLF following cataract surgery from 2007-2012. Outcomes included visual acuity and the development of various complications such as retinal detachment, elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) >30 mm Hg and cystoid macular edema. Multivariate analysis was performed to adjust for potentially confounding variables such as age and preoperative visual acuity.

Results: 28 consecutive eyes (13 same setting, 15 delayed setting) were included in the analysis. Patients in the same setting group were older than in the delayed one (81.00 vs 72.87 yrs, p=0.053). No other preoperative differences existed between groups (axial length, preoperative vision, IOP). Mean time to PPV in the delayed group was 26.6 days (range 1-91 days). Mean follow up time was 363 days (same setting) and 643 days (delayed). At most recent follow up, no significant difference existed in mean vision between the same setting (logMAR 0.42) and delayed group (logMAR 0.57), p=0.132. Multivariate analysis showed no difference in final vision when adjusting for age and preoperative vision. Although there was a trend for eyes in the same setting group to obtain good vision (>/= 20/40) faster, a higher percentage of eyes in the delayed group obtained good vision at most recent follow up (66.7% vs 23.1%, p=0.02). More eyes in the delayed group had an IOP>30 at any point (p=0.055). There was no significant difference between groups in any other complications such as retinal detachment, choroidal detachment, and CME during follow up.

Conclusions: In our cohort, same setting PPV offers no significant visual acuity advantage over delayed PPV in patients with retained lens fragments. Fewer eyes in the same setting group "ever" had an intraocular pressure >/= 30 during follow up, while no other complication differences were seen between groups.

Keywords: 688 retina • 557 inflammation • 445 cataract  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×