April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Indirect activation elicits strong correlations between light and electrical responses in ON but not OFF ganglion cells
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Maesoon Im
    Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hosp/HMS, Boston, MA
  • Shelley I Fried
    Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hosp/HMS, Boston, MA
    Boston VA Healthcare System, Boston, MA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Maesoon Im, None; Shelley Fried, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 2378. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Maesoon Im, Shelley I Fried; Indirect activation elicits strong correlations between light and electrical responses in ON but not OFF ganglion cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):2378.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: For improved quality of vision elicited by retinal prosthetics, it is important to understand the relationship between the parameters of stimulation and the resulting neural activity within the retina. Moreover, the prosthetic must be able to simultaneously create appropriate spiking patterns, e.g. those that match the light responses for each type of ganglion cell. Surprisingly, the similarities between light- and electrically-elicited response patterns have not been well studied. Here, we measured the response patterns elicited by epiretinal electric stimulation in RGCs and explored correlations between the electrically- and the light-elicited spikes within each type.

Methods: Cell-attached patch clamp was used to record spikes from RGCs in the isolated rabbit retina. RGCs were classified as ON or OFF cells by their response to stationary flashes. ON cells were further subdivided based on the presence of doublets or triplets in their spontaneous responses. After cell type classification, a monophasic half-sinusoidal wave (duration of 4ms, corresponds to half period of single 125Hz sine wave, amplitude range of -100µA to 100µA with 10µA increment) was presented typically 7 times to targeted RGCs. We recorded the spiking activity in 35 ON cells and 46 OFF cells.

Results: The electric response patterns of RGCs had clear distinctions across cell types. ON BT cells (transient light responses with doublets in the spontaneous activity) always (n=18/18) contained three or more bursts of spikes while ON BS cells typically (n=13/17) responded with two bursts. ON cells generally showed strong correlations between electrically- and light-elicited responses in terms of strength and timing. In contrast, the electric response patterns from OFF cells did not neatly differentiate into two distinct groups. Also, the OFF cells had worse correlations to light responses than did ON cells. There were further differences between ON and OFF cells when the responses to repetitive stimulation were examined: each new stimulus strongly suppressed responses to previous stimuli in ON cells. This unique behavior of ON cells created differences between ON and OFF cells in response to repetitive stimulation with various inter-stimulus intervals.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that electric stimulation elicits responses that more closely match physiological responses in ON cells than in OFF cells.

Keywords: 688 retina • 508 electrophysiology: non-clinical • 531 ganglion cells  

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.