April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Phase 3 Study of Efficacy and Safety of Once-daily Olopatadine Hydrochloride, 0.77% Ophthalmic Formulation in Patients With Allergic Conjunctivitis Using the Ora Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model (Ora-CAC™*) (NCT01743027)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Eugene McLaurin
    Total Eye Care, P.A., Memphis, TN
  • Abhijit Narvekar
    Alcon Research Ltd, Fort Worth, TX
  • Paul J Gomes
    VP Allergy, Ora Inc., Andover, MA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Eugene McLaurin, Aciex (F), Acucela (F), Alcon (F), Allergan (F), AstraZeneca (F), Bausch & Lomb (F), Inotek Pharma (F), InSite Vision (F), Lexicon Pharma (F); Abhijit Narvekar, Alcon Research Ltd (E); Paul Gomes, Ora, Inc. (E)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 2488. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Eugene McLaurin, Abhijit Narvekar, Paul J Gomes; Phase 3 Study of Efficacy and Safety of Once-daily Olopatadine Hydrochloride, 0.77% Ophthalmic Formulation in Patients With Allergic Conjunctivitis Using the Ora Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model (Ora-CAC™*) (NCT01743027). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):2488.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

To assess the efficacy and safety of a new, once-daily olopatadine 0.77% formulation compared with olopatadine 0.2%, olopatadine 0.1%, or vehicle for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.

 
Methods
 

This multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, vehicle- and active-controlled study randomized patients with a history of allergic conjunctivitis (N=345; ≥18 years) 2:2:2:1 to olopatadine 0.77% (n=98), olopatadine 0.2% (n=99), olopatadine 0.1% (n=99), or vehicle (n=49). The primary endpoint was ocular itching (OI; at 3, 5 and 7 minutes post-CAC) at onset of action and 24-hours duration of action for olopatadine 0.77% versus vehicle, and OI at 24-hours duration of action for olopatadine 0.77% versus olopatadine 0.2% or olopatadine 0.1%.

 
Results
 

Olopatadine 0.77% was superior (p<0.0001) to vehicle for OI at all post-CAC time-points at onset and 24-hours duration of action. Differences in means (olopatadine 0.77% - vehicle) were: -1.53, -1.46, -1.17 (onset) and -1.29, -1.15, -0.89 (24 hours) for olopatadine 0.77% at 3, 5 and 7 minutes post-CAC, respectively. Olopatadine 0.77% was also superior to olopatadine 0.1% for the treatment of OI at 24-hours duration of action at all post-CAC time points, and superior to olopatadine 0.2% at 3 and 5 minutes post-CAC (Table 1). There were no clinically relevant changes in safety parameters from baseline across the treatment groups, and a review of adverse events did not reveal any safety issues for olopatadine 0.77%.

 
Conclusions
 

Olopatadine 0.77% was superior to vehicle, olopatadine 0.1% and olopatadine 0.2% with respect to reduction of OI associated with allergic conjunctivitis 24 hours after dosing. Olopatadine 0.77% had a safety profile comparable to olopatadine 0.1% and olopatadine 0.2%. The superior efficacy at 24 hours of olopatadine 0.77% supports potential once-daily administration and a longer duration of symptom relief compared with olopatadine 0.1% and olopatadine 0.2%. *Ora-CAC™ and Ora Calibra™ are trademarks of Ora, Inc. The Ora Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model and Ocular Itching Scale are owned by Ora, Inc.

  
Keywords: 475 conjunctivitis • 557 inflammation • 555 immunomodulation/immunoregulation  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×