April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Duration of Immunomodulator Therapy and Uveitic Relapse
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • David Mostafavi
    New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
  • Michael Chang
    New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
  • Vicente Diaz
    New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
  • John Mauro
    New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
  • Sanjay Kedhar
    New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
  • Michael Samson
    New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships David Mostafavi, None; Michael Chang, None; Vicente Diaz, None; John Mauro, None; Sanjay Kedhar, None; Michael Samson, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 2516. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      David Mostafavi, Michael Chang, Vicente Diaz, John Mauro, Sanjay Kedhar, Michael Samson; Duration of Immunomodulator Therapy and Uveitic Relapse. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):2516.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the relationship of length of time on immunomodulator therapy (IMT) and relapse of uveitis upon IMT discontinuation.

Methods: 1100 charts were reviewed at New York Eye and Ear Infirmary from the years 2004-2006. Inclusion criteria included patients who were on Methotrexate or Cellcept for at least 1 year and had a minimum 3 year follow-up period once the medication was discontinued. Three groups were formed: those who were on IMT for 1-2 years, 2-3 years, and greater than 3 years. The first 30 patients who met the inclusion criterion were included in each group. The length of time from IMT discontinuation to relapse was noted.

Results: About half of the patients in the 1-2 year IMT group eventually had a relapse. There was no statistically difference between the 2-3 year and 3 year or greater IMT group.

Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that patients should be treated for a minimum of two years with IMT to minimize the risk of uveitic relapse in the future.

Keywords: 432 autoimmune disease  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×