April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Comparative evaluation of AcrySof IQ and Acriol EC monofocal intraocular lens after cataract extraction.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Shah Nawaz
    Ophthalmology, AIIMS, Delhi, India
  • Shika Yadav
    Ophthalmology, AIIMS, Delhi, India
  • Namrata Sharma
    Ophthalmology, AIIMS, Delhi, India
  • Jeewan S Titiyal
    Ophthalmology, AIIMS, Delhi, India
  • Rasik Behari Vajpayee
    Ophthalmology, AIIMS, Delhi, India
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Shah Nawaz, None; Shika Yadav, None; Namrata Sharma, None; Jeewan Titiyal, None; Rasik Vajpayee, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 2529. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Shah Nawaz, Shika Yadav, Namrata Sharma, Jeewan S Titiyal, Rasik Behari Vajpayee; Comparative evaluation of AcrySof IQ and Acriol EC monofocal intraocular lens after cataract extraction.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):2529.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: To compare the visual outcome of two monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.

Methods: 200 eyes of patients with age-related cataract underwent phacoemulsification and implantation of either the AcrySof IQ SN60WF or ACRIOL EC lens and there follow up period was 1 year. Uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity for distance (UCVA,BCVA) and near (UNVA,BNVA), contrast sensitivity, glare acuity, ocular aberrations,incidence of posterior capsule opacification (PCO), and Visual Function Index (VF-14) questionnaire results were evaluated.

Results: There was no statistical difference (p>0.05) between the two IOLs in UCVA, BCVA, contrast sensitivity, glare acuity, and rate of PCO formation after cataract surgery. Ocular aberrations including root mean square aberrations, higher order aberrations and spherical aberrations were significantly higher in ACRIOL group as compared to ACRYSOF group (p<0.05). However, both the IOL types improved the aspects of patients’ vision-related quality of life.

Conclusions: Both the IOLs are comparable in visual outcome, complications and posterior capsular opacification rates and vision-related quality of life

Keywords: 567 intraocular lens  

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.