April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Fixational eye movements when viewing focused and defocused images
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ulrich Wildenmann
    Institute of Ophthalmic Research, Tuebingen University, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Frank Schaeffel
    Institute of Ophthalmic Research, Tuebingen University, Tuebingen, Germany
  • William R Bobier
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Ulrich Wildenmann, None; Frank Schaeffel, None; William Bobier, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 2576. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ulrich Wildenmann, Frank Schaeffel, William R Bobier, Section of Neurobiology of the Eye; Fixational eye movements when viewing focused and defocused images. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):2576.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether the patterns of fixational eye movements are altered when images are defocused (low pass-filtered).

Methods: Six subjects (3 male, 3 female, 22 - 32 years of age, Caucasian origin) were asked to inspect an image on the computer screen which was either “in focus” or low-pass filtered by convolution with a point spread function that was equivalent to 5D of myopic defocus. The screen was at 79 cm distance and one pixel on the screen subtended a visual angle of 1.45 arcmin. The movements of the right eye were tracked at 166 Hz sampling rate in a highly magnified video image (39.9 pixels/mm) by custom-developed software (Visual C++ 8.0). A commercial IR camera (DMK 22AUC03, www.theimagingsource.com) was used and a single IR LED that generated a bright first Purkinje image. The angular resolution in natural eyes was determined to be 1-2 arcmin. Differences in eye movements variables were determined in the pooled data of all subjects using t-tests, analyzing the horizontal and vertical components of the eye movements separately.

Results: The frequency of horizontal microsaccades (defined as saccades with an amplitude between 20 and 120 arcmin) increased from 3.3±2.9 to 6.3±4.4 in low-pass filtered images recorded over 4 secs (p<0.05). The frequency of vertical microsaccades increased with the low pass-filtered image from 1.1±1.7 to 3.1±3.6 in 4 secs (p<0.05). Vertical saccades were generally smaller than horizontal ones (p<0.01). The amplitudes of horizontal microsaccades increased from 48.1±17.5 arcmin to 68.4±29.4 arcmin (p<0.01). Amplitudes of vertical microsaccades did not change (34.8±13.4 to 39.8±16.8 arcmin). The horizontal “diameter of the distributions of gaze during fixation” (described by Cherici et al, J Vis 2012, who found about 18 arcmin) changed from 15.3±6.0 arcmin to 17.6±13.1 arcmin (p=0.34; one subject p<0.01, one subject p<0.05) and vertically from 11.7±5.1 to 12.3±6.8 arcmin (p=0.69; one subject p<0.01).

Conclusions: The spatial frequency content of an image has impact on the pattern of fixational eye movements in humans. Accordingly, we expect that uncorrected myopic subjects have different patterns of fixational eye movements.

Keywords: 522 eye movements • 719 scene perception • 717 space and scene perception  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×