April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Persistence of oculomotor training effects in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Preethi Thiagarajan
    Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, TX
    State College of Optometry, State University of New York, New York, NY
  • Kenneth J Ciuffreda
    State College of Optometry, State University of New York, New York, NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Preethi Thiagarajan, None; Kenneth Ciuffreda, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 2662. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Preethi Thiagarajan, Kenneth J Ciuffreda; Persistence of oculomotor training effects in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):2662.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: Our previous study found considerable positive oculomotor training (OMT) effects in individuals with mTBI and nearwork-related visual symptoms/clinical signs. Here, persistence of the initial post-training improvements in the same individuals were assessed during the 3 and 6 months follow-up period.

Methods: Basic clinical measures of oculomotor behavior were assessed in 15 young-adults (age range: 18-40 years) with mTBI before and after OMT using standardized clinical assessment methods. In addition, reading eye movements were objectively recorded using the Visagraph system. Furthermore, nearvision symptoms were assessed using the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS), and subjective visual attention was tested with the Visual Search and Attention Test (VSAT). Eight out of the original 15 individuals who completed the OMT were reassessed at 3-months and 6-months following the OMT.

Results: Thirteen out of the 18 clinical parameters tested were abnormal at baseline. Repeated measures, one-way ANOVA (with missing data compensation) demonstrated the following: 3 parameters showed a significant effect (p<0.05) immediately after OMT, with persistence at 3 and 6 months (p<0.05): near point of convergence (NPC) break, NPC recovery, and positive fusional vergence (PFV) recovery. Four parameters showed a significant effect (p<0.05) at the 3 and 6 month follow-up only: vergence facility, Visagraph reading rate, fixations/100 words, and grade-level efficiency. Two other parameters showed a 'trend' (p=0.08) for improvement immediately after OMT: binocular accommodative amplitude and binocular accommodative facility. Thus, 7 parameters showed a persistent and positive, significant OMT effect out of the 13 parameters that were abnormal at baseline.

Conclusions: The results demonstrate both short-term and long-term OMT effects. The short-term effects demonstrate presence of robust and rapid visual neuroplasticity, even in a damaged adult brain, whereas the latter suggests a combined neural 'consolidation' effect and an oculomotor learning/practice effect with the now improved visual/oculomotor system, following the OMT.

Keywords: 622 ocular motor control • 672 reading • 522 eye movements  

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.