April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Comparison of vitreoretinal findings assessed by dilated fundus examination and B-scan ultrasound in symptomatic acute posterior vitreous detachment.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Maria A Henriquez
    Research, Oftalmosalud, Lima, Peru
  • Luis Izquierdo
    Research, Oftalmosalud, Lima, Peru
  • Renzo G Canote
    Research, Oftalmosalud, Lima, Peru
  • Raul Vargas
    Research, Oftalmosalud, Lima, Peru
  • Karen Barraza
    Research, Oftalmosalud, Lima, Peru
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Maria Henriquez, None; Luis Izquierdo, None; Renzo Canote, None; Raul Vargas, None; Karen Barraza, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 268. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Maria A Henriquez, Luis Izquierdo, Renzo G Canote, Raul Vargas, Karen Barraza; Comparison of vitreoretinal findings assessed by dilated fundus examination and B-scan ultrasound in symptomatic acute posterior vitreous detachment.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):268.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

To compare vitreoretinal findings observed under dilated fundus examination and B-scan ultrasound in symptomatic acute posterior vitreous detachment (PVD).

 
Methods
 

Prospective, comparative study including 286 eyes with acute symptomatic PVD between December 2010 to November 2013. Comprehensive ophthalmic examination included slit-lamp biomicroscopy, entire dilated ocular fundus examination with indirect ophthalmoscopy (using 20X Diopters lens) by retina specialist followed by ultrasound examination with a 10MHz probe (Quantel Medical Cinescan) by ultrasound specialist in all cases. In cases of disagreement between both diagnostic methods, a subsequent indirect ophthalmoscopy based on the ultrasound findings was performed. Statistical analysis was conducted with SPSS version 20.0.

 
Results
 

56 eyes (19.6%) had no PVD. 230 eyes (80.4%) had PVD. The vitreoretinal findings observed with ultrasound in patients with PVD were: visualization of high reflectivity operculum in 24 eyes (10.43%), retinal tears 14 (6.08%), and retinal detachment 2 eyes (0.86%). With respect to the eyes that had operculum: 10 eyes (45.5%) presented at inferotemporal quadrant and 18 eyes (81.8%) were at the peripheral retina, mean operculum anterior-posterior diameter was 1.2 mm +/- 0.3 mm. There was statistical significant differences (p<0.00) about operculum findings between ocular ultrasound and initial fundus examination (ultrasound found 24 (8.4%) eyes with operculum, compared to 4(1.4%) eyes with fundus examination), however, a subsequent indirect ophthalmoscopy based on the echographic findings bear out the presence of the operculum in 22 eyes and 20 of which required treatment. There were not statistically significant differences in retinal tears, vitreous hemorrhage and retinal detachment findings between the initial fundus examination and ultrasound examination (p > 0.5 all).

 
Conclusions
 

Both fundus and ultrasound examination gives very valuable information on the analysis on vitreoretinal findings after acute PVD, however ocular ultrasound was better detecting peripheral retinal operculum in these patients.

  
Keywords: 697 retinal detachment • 763 vitreous • 692 retinal adhesion  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×