April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Refraction along the vertical meridian in different refractive groups
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Pauline Kang
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • Paul Gifford
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • Helen A Swarbrick
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Pauline Kang, Bausch + Lomb Boston (F), BE Enterprises (F), Capricornia Contact Lens (F); Paul Gifford, Bausch + Lomb Boston (F), BE Enterprises (F), Capricornia Contact Lens (F); Helen Swarbrick, Bausch + Lomb Boston (F), BE Enterprises (F), Capricornia Contact Lens (F)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 2726. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Pauline Kang, Paul Gifford, Helen A Swarbrick; Refraction along the vertical meridian in different refractive groups. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):2726.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate differences in refraction along the vertical meridian in emmetropes and myopes

Methods: 31 subjects (age range 18-33 years; 7M, 24F) were enrolled and stratified into two groups based on their central refractive error. Subjects with spherical equivalent refraction (M) between +0.50 and -0.50DS were categorized as emmetropes and those with M between -0.51 and -6.00DS as myopes. Central and peripheral refraction along the vertical meridian was measured at 10°, 20° and 30° along the superior and inferior visual fields using the IVS Discovery aberrometer. Repeated measures ANOVA and posthoc t-tests with Bonferroni correction were used to analyze differences in refraction along the vertical meridian. A p-value of 0.05 was used to denote statistical significance.

Results: There was a significant difference in vertical refraction profiles between emmetropes and myopes (F=-4.741, p=0.003). Refraction was significantly more myopic compared to center at all positions along the vertical meridian in the emmetropic group except at 10° in the superior (p=0.156) and inferior (p=1.000) visual fields. There was no asymmetry in refraction between the superior and inferior visual fields (p>0.05). In contrast, myopes demonstrated no significant difference in peripheral refraction values from center along the vertical meridian (F=0.641, p=0.566).

Conclusions: Differences in peripheral refraction profiles were found between emmetropes and myopes along the vertical meridian. Furthermore, peripheral refraction profiles along the vertical meridian in both emmetropes and myopes were different to refraction profiles reported previously in these groups along the horizontal meridian. These findings suggest that if peripheral retinal defocus is the driver for refractive error development in humans, induction of myopic peripheral defocus rather than correction of hyperopic peripheral defocus may be necessary for myopia control.

Keywords: 676 refraction • 605 myopia  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×