April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Direction discrimination of global motion low contrast patterns in school aged children
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Lotte-Guri Bogfjellmo
    Optometry and Visual science, Buskerud and Vestfold University College, Kongsberg, Norway
    Optometry and visual science, Buskerud and Vestfold university college, Kongsberg, Norway
  • Peter J Bex
    Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  • Helle K. Falkenberg
    Optometry and Visual science, Buskerud and Vestfold University College, Kongsberg, Norway
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Lotte-Guri Bogfjellmo, None; Peter Bex, None; Helle K. Falkenberg, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 2742. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Lotte-Guri Bogfjellmo, Peter J Bex, Helle K. Falkenberg; Direction discrimination of global motion low contrast patterns in school aged children. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):2742.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: Direction discrimination of global motion develops during childhood and involves the detection of local directional signals that are then integrated across space. We used an equivalent noise (EN) paradigm to examine the limiting effects of internal noise (local directional selectivity) and sampling efficiency (global motion integration) on direction discrimination, and compared the results to motion coherence thresholds (MCT) for two patterns.

Methods: 98 observers (6-15 years) identified in 2AFC, the global direction of motion of an 8 deg central stimuli in containing 100 limited-lifetime dots of 10% Michelson contrast, moving at 2.8 and 9.8°/s in two experiments; the EN experiment estimated the internal noise and sampling efficiency from direction discrimination thresholds as a function of external directional noise; the MCT experiment measured the lowest signal to noise ratio of moving dots for discriminating translational (up/down) and radial (expansion/contraction) motion. Direction discrimination thresholds and MCT were analysed as a function of age and speed, and a correlation analysis compared internal noise and sampling efficiency with MCT.

Results: For the EN experiment, direction discrimination improved gradually until the age of 15 years (linear regression, p<0.05) for both speeds. This improvement was due to an increase in sampling efficiency (linear regression, p< 0.05) with age, and not changes in internal noise. Direction discrimination thresholds were lower at 2.8 than 9.8°/s for all observers (paired t-test, p<0.05). There was a small but not significant improvement in MCTs across the age range tested for both MCT patterns, but no difference with speed. MCT for radial motion correlated significantly with sampling efficiency, but not internal noise (p<0.05).

Conclusions: The EN task confirms that direction discrimination of low contrast global motion continues to improve in school children. Yet, this was not shown in the MCT tasks using the same stimulus parameters. This indicates that assessment of global motion depends on the parameters, and for low contrast stimuli, the MCT might not be sensitive enough to detect changes in this age group. That maturity of direction discrimination is caused by an increase in the efficiency with which direction signals are pooled, and no change in internal noise, suggests that global motion processes develop later than local motion processing.

Keywords: 756 visual development • 757 visual development: infancy and childhood • 601 motion-2D  

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.