April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
The learning curve for endoscopic endonasal dacryorhinostomy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sung-bok Lee
    Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • Kyung Nam Kim
    Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • Han Min Lee
    Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • Jung Yeul Kim
    Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • Seongwook Seo
    Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea
  • Hee Bae Ahn
    Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
  • Haeng Jin Lee
    Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Sung-bok Lee, None; Kyung Nam Kim, None; Han Min Lee, None; Jung Yeul Kim, None; Seongwook Seo, None; Hee Bae Ahn, None; Haeng Jin Lee, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 2776. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sung-bok Lee, Kyung Nam Kim, Han Min Lee, Jung Yeul Kim, Seongwook Seo, Hee Bae Ahn, Haeng Jin Lee; The learning curve for endoscopic endonasal dacryorhinostomy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):2776.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To determine the learning curve for endoscopic endonasal dacryorhinostomy (DCR) performed by three surgeons (A, B, C) in three different tertiary hospitals.

Methods: The 386 eyes of 337 patients (A: 66 eyes of 60 patients, B: 160 eyes of 144 patients, C: 160 eyes of 133 patients), who underwent endoscopic endonasal dacryorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction and were followed up for more than 6 months, were analyzed retrospectively. Success was defined at the final follow-up and the success rate was compared by dividing patients by 20, 30, 40 and 50 eyes to determine the minimum number of surgeries required to stabilize the success rate.

Results: The overall success rate was 86.0%, and each success rate was 83.3% (A), 85.0% (B) and 88.1% (C) (p=0.391). Patients were divided by 20, 30, 40 and 50 eyes for comparison. When patients were divided by 20 eyes, the success rate of surgeon A and C increased after surgeries of 40 eyes (p=0.037, p=0.002). When patients were divided by 30 eyes, the success rates of all three surgeons were significantly increased and maintained after the first 30 surgeries (p=0.020, p=0.037, p=0.024). When patients were divided by 40 eyes, the success rate of surgeon C increased after the first 40 surgeries (p=0.000). When patients were divided by 50 eyes, the success rate of surgeon B and C increased after the first 50 surgeries (p=0.001, p=0.000). After the 30 surgeries, in which the success rate was stabilized, the overall success rate reached 93.6% and each success rate was 94.4% (A), 91.5% (B) and 95.4% (C)(p=0.224).

Conclusions: To achieve high stable DCR success rates, it is believed that at least 30 surgeries would be required.

Keywords: 579 learning • 465 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×