April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
In vitro Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile of Ocular Pathogens - Results from the First ARMOR Canada Surveillance Study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Joseph M Blondeau
    Clinical Microbiology, Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Canada
  • Christine M Sanfilippo
    Microbiology and Sterilization Sciences, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Rochester, NY
  • Timothy W Morris
    Microbiology and Sterilization Sciences, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Rochester, NY
  • Jennifer Deane
    Eurofins Medinet, Chantilly, VA
  • Daniel F Sahm
    Eurofins Medinet, Chantilly, VA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Joseph Blondeau, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated (C), Bausch & Lomb Incorporated (F); Christine Sanfilippo, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated (E); Timothy Morris, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated (E); Jennifer Deane, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated (F); Daniel Sahm, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated (F)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 2840. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Joseph M Blondeau, Christine M Sanfilippo, Timothy W Morris, Jennifer Deane, Daniel F Sahm; In vitro Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile of Ocular Pathogens - Results from the First ARMOR Canada Surveillance Study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):2840.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

The Antibiotic Resistance Monitoring in Ocular Microorganisms (ARMOR) surveillance study, which monitors the potency of a variety of antibiotics against ocular pathogens, was initiated in the USA in 2009. In recent years, clinical sites in Canada have participated in the study, and the results for 2012-2013 are presented here.

 
Methods
 

A total of 180 clinical isolates (65 Staphylococcus aureus, 57 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), 15 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 24 Haemophilus influenzae, and 19 Streptococcus pneumoniae) were collected across 7 geographically distributed sites in Canada from patients with ocular infections. Broth microdilution susceptibility testing was performed for up to 16 antibiotics according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Isolates were categorized as susceptible or non-susceptible (intermediate and resistant) based on systemic breakpoints, where available.

 
Results
 

Resistance among the staphylococci was highest for azithromycin (45-51%), oxacillin/methicillin (14-42%), and ciprofloxacin (29-33%); among the fluoroquinolones, besifloxacin had the lowest MIC90 values (1 µg/ml for S. aureus, 0.5 µg/ml for CoNS), equal to or more potent than that of vancomycin. More than 21% of the S. aureus isolates and over 43% of the CoNS isolates were non-susceptible to three or more drug classes. Methicillin-resistant isolates of S. aureus (MRSA) and CoNS (MRCoNS) were predominantly multi-drug resistant (89-92%). Among S. pneumoniae isolates, 32% were resistant to azithromycin and 16% were non-susceptible to imipenem, yet all were susceptible to the fluoroquinolones, ceftriaxone, chloramphenicol, and penicillin. While one H. influenzae isolate was non-susceptible to fluoroquinolones, and another showed intermediate resistance to chloramphenicol, no resistance was detected among the P. aeruginosa isolates.

 
Conclusions
 

This study provides the first report of susceptibility data against solely ocular isolates collected across Canada, and provides a baseline activity profile for relevant antibiotics against important ophthalmic pathogens. The information obtained from this surveillance study should be considered before initiating empiric treatment of common eye infections. Future monitoring in Canada is warranted to assess current resistance trends.

 
Keywords: 433 bacterial disease • 422 antibiotics/antifungals/antiparasitics • 463 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: prevalence/incidence  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×