April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
A Universal Colour Discrimination Test suitable for observers with low vision
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Caterina Ripamonti
    Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Sarah Kalwarowsky
    Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Marko Nardini
    Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Department of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 3536. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Caterina Ripamonti, Sarah Kalwarowsky, Marko Nardini; A Universal Colour Discrimination Test suitable for observers with low vision. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):3536.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Most of the popular colour vision tests (e.g. Ishihara, FM 100 Hue Test) were originally developed to screen and classify dichromats. As these individuals enjoy relatively normal visual acuity, the ‘good-visual-acuity’ requirement to perform these tests has been neglected. As a consequence, individuals affected by low vision may be wrongly diagnosed with a colour vision deficiency on the basis of their failure to perform these tests. In some patient groups with low vision, measuring chromatic discrimination may be useful for monitoring disease progression and evaluating the success of new treatments. For this reason, we have developed a Universal Colour Discrimination Test (UCDT), which is suitable also for individuals with visual acuity worse than 1.0 logMAR.

Methods: The test consists of circles of random luminance presented on a computer screen. A small sub-set of circles delineates a large 5-degree square that varies in saturation and hue. Observers indicated whether the coloured square appeared on the left or on the right. A staircase procedure measured the minimum saturation required for each observer to discriminate the square from the achromatic background. The task was easy to perform, even by 7-year-old observers. Participants were labelled as Normal or Affected according to their performance to additional colour vision tests included in the protocol.

Results: We describe colour discrimination using three indices, which are derived by fitting the observers’ thresholds with an ellipse: the length of the major axis (m.a.), its angle (phi), and the axial ratio (r). We found that Normal r was approximately equal to 1 and generally agreed with Normal r obtained with the Cambridge Colour Test (CCT). Normal m.a. showed no particular orientation, and was about 1 log unit shorter than Affected m.a. Affected phi was consistent (when the comparison was possible) with the observer’s performance at other tests. More importantly, our test was able to measure colour discrimination in all Affected observers, including those who, due to their low visual acuity had been unable to perform the conventional colour vision tests, including the CCT.

Conclusions: The UCDT can accurately measure colour discrimination even in observers with low vision. This result has important clinical implications, as it allows to determine chromatic discrimination baselines and monitor their changes in patients undergoing clinical treatments.

Keywords: 471 color vision • 754 visual acuity • 501 discrimination  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×