April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Is Retinal Shape different in Asians and Caucasians? Estimation from Peripheral Refraction and Peripheral Eye Length Methods
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Pavan K Verkicharla
    School of Optometry & Vision Science, Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • David A Atchison
    School of Optometry & Vision Science, Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • Marwan Suheimat
    School of Optometry & Vision Science, Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • Katrina L Schmid
    School of Optometry & Vision Science, Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • Ankit Mathur
    School of Optometry & Vision Science, Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • Edward A Mallen
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom
  • Xin Wei
    Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc., Jacksonville, FL
  • Noel A Brennan
    Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc., Jacksonville, FL
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Pavan Verkicharla, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (F); David Atchison, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (F); Marwan Suheimat, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (F); Katrina Schmid, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (F); Ankit Mathur, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (F); Edward Mallen, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (F); Xin Wei, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (E); Noel Brennan, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (E)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 3592. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Pavan K Verkicharla, David A Atchison, Marwan Suheimat, Katrina L Schmid, Ankit Mathur, Edward A Mallen, Xin Wei, Noel A Brennan; Is Retinal Shape different in Asians and Caucasians? Estimation from Peripheral Refraction and Peripheral Eye Length Methods. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):3592. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Race appears to be associated with myopiogenesis, with East Asians showing high myopia prevalence. Considering structural variations in the eye, it is possible that retinal shapes are different between races. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare retinal shapes between racial groups using peripheral refraction (PR) and peripheral eye lengths (PEL).

Methods: A Shin-Nippon SRW5000 autorefractor and a Haag-Streit Lenstar LS900 biometer measured PR and PEL, respectively, along horizontal (H) and vertical (V) fields out to ±35° in 5° steps in 29 Caucasian (CA), 16 South Asian (SA) and 23 East Asian (EA) young adults (spherical equivalent range +0.75D to −5.00D in all groups). Retinal vertex curvature Rv and asphericity Q were determined from two methods: a) PR (Dunne): The Gullstrand-Emsley eye was modified according to participant’s intraocular lengths and anterior cornea curvature. Ray-tracing was performed at each angle through the stop, altering cornea asphericity until peripheral astigmatism matched experimental measurements. Retinal curvature and hence retinal co-ordinate intersection with the chief ray were altered until sagittal refraction matched its measurement. b) PEL: Ray-tracing was performed at each angle through the anterior corneal centre of curvature of the Gullstrand-Emsley eye. Ignoring lens refraction, retinal co-ordinates relative to the fovea were determined from PEL and trigonometry. From sets of retinal co-ordinates, conic retinal shapes were fitted in terms of Rv and Q. Repeated-measures ANOVA were conducted on Rv and Q, and post hoc t-tests with Bonferroni correction were used to compare races.

Results: In all racial groups both methods showed greater Rv for the horizontal than for the vertical meridian and greater Rv for myopes than emmetropes. Rv was greater in EA than in CA (P=0.02), with Rv for SA being intermediate and not significantly different from CA and EA. The PEL method provided larger Rv than the PR method: PEL: EA vs CA 87±13 vs 83±11 m-1 (H), 79±13 vs 72±14 m-1 (V); PR: EA vs CA 79±10 vs 67±10 m-1 (H), 71±17 vs 66±12 m-1 (V). Q did not vary significantly with race.

Conclusions: Estimates of Rv, but not of Q, varied significantly with race. The greater Rv found in EA than in CA and the comparatively high prevalence rate of myopia in many Asian countries may be related.

Keywords: 605 myopia • 688 retina  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×