April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Two patterns of ciliary muscle growth in myopia
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Melissa D Bailey
    Optometry, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • Chiu-Yen Kao
    Mathematics, Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, CA
  • Nidhi Satiani
    Optometry, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • Loraine T Sinnott
    Optometry, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Melissa Bailey, U.S. Utility Patent Application No. 13/757243 (P); Chiu-Yen Kao, U.S. Utility Patent Application No. 13/757243 (P); Nidhi Satiani, None; Loraine Sinnott, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 3643. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Melissa D Bailey, Chiu-Yen Kao, Nidhi Satiani, Loraine T Sinnott; Two patterns of ciliary muscle growth in myopia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):3643. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

To test the hypothesis that more than one ciliary muscle growth pattern is present in human myopia and to determine if each pattern is different from emmetropic ciliary muscle growth.

 
Methods
 

Children with emmetropia (N = 55, 9.3 ± 1.2 years), myopia (N = 84, 9.2 ± 1.1 years), and hyperopia (N = 46, 8.4 ± 1.4 years) from a longitudinal study were included in analyses. Cycloplegic autorefraction was used to determine spherical equivalent refractive error. Cycloplegic images of the ciliary muscle were obtained with the Visante Anterior Segment OCT and processed with a semi-automatic algorithm to obtain thickness measurements. The thickness of the ciliary muscle at 2 mm posterior to the scleral spur (CMT2) was used to create multilevel growth models of ciliary muscle development for each refractive error group. A cluster analysis, Ward’s method, was used to group the growth curves of myopes into two groups (Myopia 1 and Myopia 2).

 
Results
 

The CMT2 growth curve for one myopia group identified by the cluster analysis (Myopia 2) had significantly larger intercept when compared to all other groups (all p ≤ .0001) and a significantly steeper slope when compared to all other groups: emmetropia (β = −12.5, p = 0.03), myopia 1 (β = −16.7, p = 0.002), and hyperopia (β = −23.8, p ≤ 0.0001).

 
Conclusions
 

There appear to be at least two different ciliary muscle growth patterns present among children who develop myopia: one that is more similar to the patterns observed in emmetropia or hyperopia and another pattern that is characterized by a larger muscle that increases in thickness at a greater rate than what was observed in all other children. Our future studies will determine if differences in ciliary muscle thickness indicate that human myopia has more than one underlying cause.

 
 
Ciliary muscle growth curves by refractive error group. Myopia 1 and Myopia 2 were identified through cluster analysis as two distinct growth curve patterns. Myopia 2 has a significantly greater slope (all p < 0.03) and intercept (all p ≤ .0001) when compared to all other groups.
 
Ciliary muscle growth curves by refractive error group. Myopia 1 and Myopia 2 were identified through cluster analysis as two distinct growth curve patterns. Myopia 2 has a significantly greater slope (all p < 0.03) and intercept (all p ≤ .0001) when compared to all other groups.
 
Keywords: 456 ciliary muscle • 677 refractive error development • 605 myopia  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×