April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
The Scheimpflug corneal deformation response parameters for different diagnoses in a glaucoma clinic.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Wan Haslina
    VIsual Science Department, Aston University, birmingham, United Kingdom
    Ophthalmology Department, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Maged Nessim
    VIsual Science Department, Aston University, birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Shehzad Naroo
    VIsual Science Department, Aston University, birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Sunil Shah
    VIsual Science Department, Aston University, birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Wan Haslina, None; Maged Nessim, None; Shehzad Naroo, None; Sunil Shah, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 3725. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Wan Haslina, Maged Nessim, Shehzad Naroo, Sunil Shah; The Scheimpflug corneal deformation response parameters for different diagnoses in a glaucoma clinic.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):3725.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To analyse the relationship of the corneal deformation response parameters by dynamic ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug imaging in ocular hypertension (OHT), primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and normal tension glaucoma (NTG) using the Corvis® ST (Oculus Optigerate Germany) (CST).

Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was done at Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, United Kingdom. Two hundred and sixty three eyes of patients diagnosed with OHT (n=44 eyes), normal tension glaucoma (n=34 eyes) and POAG (n=124 eyes) were assessed. A group of 60 normal eyes were included in analysis as a control. The patients underwent randomised examinations with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and CST. The corneal deformation response indices, intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured by CST.

Results: The correlation between the IOP by CST and by Goldmann applanation tonometry was very good across all study groups. (p<0.01) The OHT group showed a significant difference in corneal deformation response (applanation1 time, applanation1 velocity, highest concavity radius and amplitude) : p<0.01. Post Hoc Tukey’s analysis revealed variable significant difference of the corneal deformation parameters amongst the different diagnoses. The IOP was noted to influence the difference of the deformation amplitude among the study groups (p<0.01). The Scheimpflug corneal deformation response parameters were not affected by the CCT (p>0.05).

Conclusions: Each diagnosis seemed to have its special corneal deformation characteristics. Further studies with larger samples of all glaucoma diagnoses will help to explore the role of corneal deformation response in identifying a possible diagnosis of glaucoma during pre-screening with a CST.

Keywords: 479 cornea: clinical science • 568 intraocular pressure  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×