April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Exploring Accommodative accuracy in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Julie-Anne Little
    Vision Science Research Group, University of Ulster, Coleraine, United Kingdom
  • Pamela Anketell
    Vision Science Research Group, University of Ulster, Coleraine, United Kingdom
  • Lesley Doyle
    Vision Science Research Group, University of Ulster, Coleraine, United Kingdom
  • Kathryn J Saunders
    Vision Science Research Group, University of Ulster, Coleraine, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Julie-Anne Little, None; Pamela Anketell, None; Lesley Doyle, None; Kathryn Saunders, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 3769. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Julie-Anne Little, Pamela Anketell, Lesley Doyle, Kathryn J Saunders; Exploring Accommodative accuracy in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):3769.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: Atypical visual processing has been reported in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (see Dakin and Frith 2005 for review), however no data exist exploring accommodative function in this patient group.

Methods: Accommodation and vergence were assessed using an infrared photorefraction system (PowerRefractor III) in a sub-group of children with ASD who had participated in a clinical study of vision (Anketell et al. 2013). The 29 participants (13.2+/-3 years) had good visual acuity (mean -0.16logMAR) and were highly compliant with previous testing. Participants viewed a naturalistic movie target at 5 dioptric demands under four viewing conditions: (i) full binocular, (ii) monocular, (iii) blurred binocular and (iv) blurred monocular. Blur was achieved with a Difference-of-Gaussian target. Individual lens and prism calibration protocols were conducted (Bharadwaj et al. 2013) and calibration applied to the data. The mean of two seconds of stable accommodative and vergence data for each target distance was captured and accommodative and vergence gain slopes and AC/A and CA/C ratios were calculated. Age-matched control children (12.3+/-3.3 years) underwent the same testing procedure. Following full optometric workup all wore appropriate refractive correction.

Results: Accommodative gain slopes for the ASD group were significantly lower than those of controls for full binocular viewing (condition i) (ASD: 0.74+/-0.18; controls 0.87+/-0.22; one way ANOVA F(1,66)=6.78 p=0.01). There was no significant difference in accommodative gain between ASD and control data under the other conditions, however the loss of a disparity cue (condition ii) tended to affect accommodative accuracy more than the loss of a blur cue (condition iii). While seven ASD children (24%) had high AC/A or CA/C ratios outside the 95th centile derived from control data, overall there was no significant difference between CA/C and AC/A ratios found between groups. In both participant groups, those with lower accommodative gains had high AC/A ratios relative to their CA/C ratios (p<0.03).

Conclusions: In general, despite good visual function in the ASD group, accommodative responses were reduced, and there was evidence of anomalous coupling of accommodation and convergence.

Keywords: 404 accommodation • 434 binocular vision/stereopsis • 467 clinical laboratory testing  

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.