April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
The factors affect repetitive injections of intravitreal Bevacizumab in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Kyung Tae Kang
    Ophthalmology, Dong San Medical Center, Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
  • Yu Cheol Kim
    Ophthalmology, Dong San Medical Center, Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
  • Kwang-Soo Kim
    Ophthalmology, Dong San Medical Center, Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Kyung Tae Kang, None; Yu Cheol Kim, None; Kwang-Soo Kim, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 3887. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kyung Tae Kang, Yu Cheol Kim, Kwang-Soo Kim; The factors affect repetitive injections of intravitreal Bevacizumab in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):3887.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To identify the factors that affect repeatability of intravitreal Bevacizumab injection in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion.

Methods: A total of 26 patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion(B.R.V.O.) within 1 month since diagnosis were examined. Initial best corrected visual acuity, central macular thickness, type of branch retinal vein occlusion according to the involved vein branch, lens status, distance between fovea and occlusion site, type of macular edema, presence of macula hemorrhage, presence of capillary nonperfusion were evaluated at the time of diagnosis. The patients had an intravitreal Bevacizumab injection at the time of diagnosis, and had reinjections when macular edema and visual acuity aggravated. Presence of focal laser treatment during followup period was also evaluated. According to each considering factors, the free of reinjection rate which was considered to be survival rate was evaluated during 1 year since the first injection.

Results: The patients with initial visual acuity better than LogMAR 0.5 showed 52.6% survival rate within 1yr compare to 14.3% of the patients with visual acuity worse than LogMAR 0.5(p<0.01). The patients with occluded site closer than distance of 2.5 Disc Diameter from fovea had 57.1% of survival rate, and the patients with occluded vein farther than distance of 2.5 Disc Diameter from fovea had 25.0%(p=0.04). Macular B.R.V.O. and major B.R.V.O. patient had 25.0% and 71.5% of survival rate, respectively(P-0.01). Presence of capillary nonperfusion, central macular thickness, focal laser treatment, macular hemorrhage and lens status, macular edema type did not significantly affect the survival rate of the patients.

Conclusions: The patients with B.R.V.O. are suggested to have less chance of repetitive intravitreal Bevacizumab due to macular edema when initial visual acuity is better than LogMAR 0.5, occluded site is closer than 2.5DD from fovea, and macular branch is involved at the initial diagnosis.

Keywords: 688 retina • 748 vascular endothelial growth factor • 749 vascular occlusion/vascular occlusive disease  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×