April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Brainport artificial vision study: tongue’s tactile motion detection in children
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Dongsheng Yang
    Ophthalmology, Akron Children, Akron, OH
  • Richard W Hertle
    Ophthalmology, Akron Children, Akron, OH
  • Nancy Hanna
    Ophthalmology, Akron Children, Akron, OH
  • Tonia Polansky
    Ophthalmology, Akron Children, Akron, OH
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Dongsheng Yang, None; Richard Hertle, None; Nancy Hanna, None; Tonia Polansky, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 4119. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Dongsheng Yang, Richard W Hertle, Nancy Hanna, Tonia Polansky; Brainport artificial vision study: tongue’s tactile motion detection in children. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):4119.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: To investigate tactile motion detection of the tongue in children.

Methods: The Brainport vision device consists of a miniature video camera mounted to a pair of glasses. The video is converted to an electrotactile stimulus on an electrode array placed on the surface of the tongue. The tongue array is housed in an epoxy resin and includes 400 (20x20) steel electrodes in a 3x3 cm square. The stimulus image is a 3° white circle displayed in the center of a black background on a computer monitor. The circle randomly moved in 4 different directions (up, down, right, and left) at 5 different velocities (8°/second, 16°/s, 25°/s, 32°/s, 50°/s). Three subjects (9-14 years old) participated in the study and they were required to have 5-6 visits. At each visit, they were blindfolded and first received about 30 minutes training in object detection and pattern recognition before they performed the motion detection task. Each subject performed multiple sessions of the motion detection task after one session of motion detection training. The subjects initiated movements of the stimulus circle after they perceived the circle, and then report the direction of the movement after each movement through a game device. All data were recorded by an Eyelink data collection computer for offline analysis. Percent of correct perception of the movements were calculated for each of the subjects.

Results: The correct motion detection in all directions to all velocities was 91% (85%-100%), 35% (20%-65%), and 25% (20%-30%) in 3 different subjects.

Conclusions: our preliminary results show that tongue’s tactile motion detection sensitivity is high, although it varied among subjects.

Keywords: 601 motion-2D • 753 vision and action  

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.