April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Intermediate Term Follow-Up after a Single-Piece-Acrylic Intraocular Lens Implantation in the Ciliary Sulcus- A Cross-sectional Study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Shai Bar-Sela
    Department of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Efrat Fleissig
    Department of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Shai Bar-Sela, None; Efrat Fleissig, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 4190. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Shai Bar-Sela, Efrat Fleissig; Intermediate Term Follow-Up after a Single-Piece-Acrylic Intraocular Lens Implantation in the Ciliary Sulcus- A Cross-sectional Study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):4190.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

To report the efficacy and safety of sulcus implantation of a single-piece-acrylic intraocular lens (SPA-IOL), designed for both in-the-bag and sulcus positioning.

 
Methods
 

A prospective cross-sectional study including 12 patients, who underwent phacoemulsification with posterior capsule tear (PCT) and sulcus implantation of SPA-IOL designed for both in-the-bag and sulcus positioning (Seelens AF, Hanita, Israel; figures 1&2) between January 2009 and March 2012 (follow-up 12-37 months). Preoperatively corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), subjective refraction and intraocular pressure (IOP) were recorded. Postoperative evaluation included anamnesis for IOL edge symptoms and transient visual obscurations (TVO) along with CDVA, subjective refraction IOP, anterior segment biomicroscopy, gonioscopy, assessment of IOL centration, fundus biomicroscopy and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of the macula.

 
Results
 

Preoperatively, mean CDVA was 0.84±0.60 LogMAR (Counting Finger-20/33) improving to 0.18±0.13 LogMAR (20/40-20/20) at last examination (p=0.004), as all the patients gained better CDVA. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent was -0.2±2.5 Diopter (D) (-4.0D to +5.4D) reaching -1.9±0.9 (-4.0D to -0.6D) at last examination (p=0.12). Mean preoperative refractive astigmatism magnitude was 1.0±0.6D (0.3D to 2.3D) changing to 1.1±1.0D (0.0D to 3.0D) at last examination (p=0.88). Mean preoperative IOP was 14.7±3.2 mmHg (11-23 mmHg) without medications reaching 15.9±3.3 mmHg (10-21 mmHg) at last follow up (p=0.21). Postoperatively one patient required two medications for IOP control in his study and contralateral eyes. None of the patients had symptoms of IOL edge or TVO. There were no intraocular hemorrhages, inflammatory reactions, or pigment dispersion and the IOLs were well centered in all cases. Central macular thickness was 280±33 μm (193-310 μm).

 
Conclusions
 

Appropriately designed SPA-IOL may be implanted in the ciliary sulcus during phacoemulsification with PCT rather than switching to another backup IOL demanding wound enlargement.

 
 
A diagram of the single-piece-acrylic intraocular lens used in this study.
 
A diagram of the single-piece-acrylic intraocular lens used in this study.
 
 
A slit lamp photograph of our SPA-IOL, which was implanted during phacoemulsification complicated with large posterior capsule tear and vitreous loss.
 
A slit lamp photograph of our SPA-IOL, which was implanted during phacoemulsification complicated with large posterior capsule tear and vitreous loss.
 
Keywords: 445 cataract • 567 intraocular lens  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×