April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Central retinal venous pressure in patients with retinal vascular occlusion
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Evelyn Voigt
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany
  • Karin R Pillunat
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany
  • Eberhard Spoerl
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany
  • Richard P Stodtmeister
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany
  • Lutz E Pillunat
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Evelyn Voigt, None; Karin Pillunat, None; Eberhard Spoerl, None; Richard Stodtmeister, None; Lutz Pillunat, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 4340. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Evelyn Voigt, Karin R Pillunat, Eberhard Spoerl, Richard P Stodtmeister, Lutz E Pillunat; Central retinal venous pressure in patients with retinal vascular occlusion. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):4340.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to determine the central retinal venous pressure (CRVP) in patients with retinal vascular occlusions using a contact lens ophthalmodynamometer calibrated in mmHg.

Methods: 22 patients (13 male/ 9 female; age 64.6+10.5 years) with retinal vascular occlusion on one eye (6x central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), 3x branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO), 9x central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), 4x branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO)) were included in a prospective clinical study. CRVP was measured using a Goldmann contact lens associated ophthalmodynamometric device (CLD; Meditron GmbH, Voelklingen, Germany) in the occlusion (10) and the healthy fellow eye (22). In 12 patients CRVP in the occlusion eye was not measured because central retinal venous pulsation could not be visualized. As statistical procedures the Pearson correlation and the student’s t-test for independent samples were applied.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in CRVP (P=0.466), IOP (P=0.229) and MOPP (mean ocular perfusion pressure, P=0.378) between the occlusion and the healthy fellow eye. A statistically high correlation in CRVP could be shown between both eyes (r=0.948, P=0.0001). CRVP in central retinal vascular occlusions (CRAO and CRVO) was higher than in branch retinal vascular occlusions (BRAO and BRVO): 44.4±13.5 mmHg and 29.9±12.4mmHg respectively (P=0.026).

Conclusions: CRVP in occlusion and healthy fellow eyes showed no significant difference, but a high correlation. If a high CRVP represents a risk factor for central retinal vascular occlusions, the fellow eye would be at risk too. A high venous outflow resistance seems to be present in both eyes and might therefore be a valuable clinical predictor. Interestingly CRVP was elevated in arterial and venous occlusions. The reason might be similar atherosclerotic changes in the lamina cribrosa.

Keywords: 749 vascular occlusion/vascular occlusive disease • 436 blood supply • 568 intraocular pressure  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×