April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Evaluating the Impact of Glaucoma and Word Features on Out-Loud Reading
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Priya Mary Mathews
    Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • Michael McCloskey
    Department of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
  • Gary S Rubin
    Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • Pradeep Y Ramulu
    Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Priya Mathews, None; Michael McCloskey, None; Gary Rubin, None; Pradeep Ramulu, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 4574. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Priya Mary Mathews, Michael McCloskey, Gary S Rubin, Pradeep Y Ramulu; Evaluating the Impact of Glaucoma and Word Features on Out-Loud Reading. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):4574.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To assess the impact of glaucoma on specific measures of out loud reading, including time to say individual words, interval time between consecutive words, lexical errors, skipped words, and repetitions.

Methods: Glaucoma subjects (n=64) with bilateral visual field loss and glaucoma suspect controls (n=57) were recorded while reading an International Reading Speed Text (IReST) passage out loud. Audio recordings were evaluated by a masked evaluator to determine the start and end of each recorded word and to identify reading errors.

Results: Glaucoma subjects demonstrated a longer duration to recite individual words [265 vs. 243 milliseconds (ms), p<0.001], a longer interval time between words (154 vs. 124 ms, p<0.001), and a longer word/interval complex (defined as the time spanned by the word and the interval preceding the word) (417 vs. 365 ms, p<0.001) than controls, but did not differ in the number of repetitions, skipped words, or lexical errors (p>0.1 for all). In multivariable analyses adjusting for age, race, sex, education, cognition, word length, and word complexity, each 0.1 decrement in log contrast sensitivity was associated with a 6.3 ms longer word time (95% CI=3.8-8.9; p<0.001), an 8.7 ms longer interval time (95% CI=5.3-12.1; p<0.001), and a 15.0 ms longer word/interval complex (95% CI=9.7-20.3; p<0.001). Additionally, severity of glaucoma damage (as determined by contrast sensitivity) was found to significantly interact with word length, word complexity, and word location at the beginning of a new line with regards to word/interval complex duration (p<0.05 for all), suggesting that word length, word complexity, and word location at the beginning of a line all had a greater effect on word/interval duration in patients with lower CS. Glaucoma severity was also associated with increased odds of making a lexical error (OR=1.20 for every 0.1 decrement in log contrast sensitivity; 95% CI=1.02-1.39, p<0.05), but not with odds of skipping or repeating a word (p>0.05 for both).

Conclusions: Glaucoma patients have greater difficulty reciting longer and more complex words, as well as transitioning to new lines of text. Additionally, glaucoma severity is associated with a higher likelihood of making a lexical error. These problem areas may require special attention when designing methods to rehabilitate reading in patients with glaucoma.

Keywords: 568 intraocular pressure • 584 low vision • 672 reading  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×