April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Descemet’s Membrane Thickness (DMT): A Novel Sign for the Diagnosis of Corneal Graft Rejection
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Mohamed Abou Shousha
    Saint Louis University Eye Institute, Saint Louis, MO
  • Matthew Council
    Saint Louis University Eye Institute, Saint Louis, MO
  • Sean Edelstein
    Saint Louis University Eye Institute, Saint Louis, MO
  • Ravi S Shah
    Saint Louis University Eye Institute, Saint Louis, MO
  • Xiaotang Yin
    Saint Louis University Eye Institute, Saint Louis, MO
  • Eric Schmidt
    Saint Louis University Eye Institute, Saint Louis, MO
  • Patrick M Stuart
    Saint Louis University Eye Institute, Saint Louis, MO
  • Sonia H Yoo
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL
  • Victor L Perez
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Mohamed Abou Shousha, University of Miami Application No.: 61809518 (P); Matthew Council, None; Sean Edelstein, None; Ravi Shah, None; Xiaotang Yin, None; Eric Schmidt, None; Patrick Stuart, None; Sonia Yoo, University of Miami Application No.: 61809518 (P); Victor Perez, University of Miami Application No.: 61809518 (P)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 4863. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mohamed Abou Shousha, Matthew Council, Sean Edelstein, Ravi S Shah, Xiaotang Yin, Eric Schmidt, Patrick M Stuart, Sonia H Yoo, Victor L Perez; Descemet’s Membrane Thickness (DMT): A Novel Sign for the Diagnosis of Corneal Graft Rejection. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):4863.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Evaluate the use of Descemet’s Membrane Thickness (DMT) in the diagnosis of corneal graft rejection.

Methods: We evaluated 63 eyes, which included: 27 functional grafts, 10 immunologically rejected grafts, 6 failed grafts secondary to non-immunological causes and 20 normal control eyes. These eyes were imaged using spectral domain optical coherence tomography and DMT was compared among groups and correlated to status of their corneas.

Results: Immunologically rejected grafts showed significantly thicker DMT than normal control eyes and functional grafts (52 vs. 17 and 17 μm; P<0.001). While comparison of total corneal thickness between immunologically rejected grafts and non-immunologically failed grafts did not reveal a significant difference (886 vs. 758 μm, P=0.9), comparison of DMT between these groups demonstrated a greater than two-fold difference (52 vs. 24 μm, P=0.01). In non-immunologically failed grafts, both DMT and host corneal thickness were 1.5 fold those of functional grafts. Whereas, in immunologically rejected grafts, DMT thickening was 3.25 fold thicker when corneal thickness was only 1.7 fold thicker than those of functional grafts.

Conclusions: DMT is a novel sign for the diagnosis of corneal graft immunological rejection. It is of particular interest that in rejected grafts, the increase in DMT is caused by the immunological insult not just the swelling of the cornea. Evaluating the use of DMT to diagnose subclinical rejection is warranted.

Keywords: 479 cornea: clinical science • 550 imaging/image analysis: clinical • 465 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×