April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Impact of keratocyte supernatant on epithelial cell migration and proliferation after corneal crosslinking (CXL)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ming-Feng Wu
    Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany
  • Tanja Stachon
    Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany
  • Jiong Wang
    Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany
  • Xuefei Song
    Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany
  • Achim Langenbucher
    Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
  • Berthold Seitz
    Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany
  • Nora Szentmary
    Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Ming-Feng Wu, None; Tanja Stachon, None; Jiong Wang, None; Xuefei Song, None; Achim Langenbucher, None; Berthold Seitz, None; Nora Szentmary, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 505. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ming-Feng Wu, Tanja Stachon, Jiong Wang, Xuefei Song, Achim Langenbucher, Berthold Seitz, Nora Szentmary; Impact of keratocyte supernatant on epithelial cell migration and proliferation after corneal crosslinking (CXL). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):505. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of keratocyte supernatant on migration and proliferation of human corneal epithelial cells (HCEC) following crosslinking (CXL), in vitro.

Methods: Primary human keratocytes were cultured in DMEM/F12 with 10% FCS. Thereafter, keratocyte cell cultures underwent UVA illumination using light (375 nm) for 4.10 minutes during exposure to 0.05% and 0.1% riboflavin and 20% dextran containing PBS. After removal of the riboflavin containing medium, cultures were incubated in DMEM with 10% FCS for 5 or 24 hours and the supernatant of the cells was collected. HCECs were cultured in DMEM/F12 with 5% FCS, 0.5% DMSO, 10 ng/mL human epidermal growth factor, 1% insulin-transferrin-selenium. Then the HCEC culture medium was replaced by the keratocyte supernatant. Thereafter, HCEC migration was analyzed using scratch assay and cell proliferation was determined by the ELISA-BrdU Kit.

Results: Using riboflavin or illumination separately, there was no significant difference in HCEC migration or HCEC proliferation between treated and control cells in any of the groups (p>0.13). The riboflavin-UVA keratocyte supernatant did not have a significant impact on the HCEC migration, compared to controls at the examined time-points (p>0.39). Proliferation of HCEC with a riboflavin-UVA keratocyte supernatant was unchanged using 0.05% riboflavin conditioned for 5 or 24 hours (p>0.07) and using 0.1% riboflavin conditioned for 5 hours incubation (p=0.16), compared to controls. However, using 0.1% riboflavin concentration and for 24 hours conditioned keratocyte supernatant, proliferation of HCEC was significantly decreased (p=0.03), compared to the control.

Conclusions: Keratocyte secretion does not seem to have an impact on epithelial cell migration in the short term. However, decreases proliferation of HCECs after standard crosslinking therapy after 24 hours, in vitro.

Keywords: 484 cornea: stroma and keratocytes • 482 cornea: epithelium  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×