April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Uveal Melanoma Cytology : Computer Assisted Diagnosis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Arun D Singh
    Cole Eye Inst, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
    Ophthalmic Oncology, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, OH
  • Nathan Tenley
    Image IQ, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
  • Charles V Biscotti
    Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Arun Singh, None; Nathan Tenley, None; Charles Biscotti, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 5068. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Arun D Singh, Nathan Tenley, Charles V Biscotti; Uveal Melanoma Cytology : Computer Assisted Diagnosis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):5068.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

To develop a fully automated, customized image processing algorithm to quantify the total number of cells in a given cytological slide and to detect spindle cells as an aid in the diagnosis of uveal melanoma.

 
Methods
 

Comparative masked study of ocular FNAB cytopathology slides prepared using standard laboratory techniques in a cytopathology laboratory. 10 cases of primary uveal melanoma and 5 cases of non-melanoma uveal tumors. The manual counts of all cells and spindle cells by an independent masked reader were recodered as standrad. The manual counts were compared to the automated counts (CAD) for each image tile to analyze the detection rates for any cell and spindle cells (Figure 1). The CAD algorithm was tuned to minimize the difference between the manual and computer assisted diagnosis (CAD) outputs for each image tile.

 
Results
 

The manual counts for any cell ranged from 5.7 to 401.8 / μm2 (mean = 112.8) for non-melanoma cases and 7.1 to 112.1 / μm2 (mean = 49.5) for melanoma cases. The computer assisted and the manual counts had an average cell detection difference of 9.9 ± 19.2 for non-melanoma cases and 4.0 ± 7.1 for the melanoma cases (average 9.8%). There was no significant correlation between the cellularity of the slide and the percentage difference in counts. The spindle cell detection difference between computer assisted and the manual counts was 5.2 ± 4.6 and -7.6 ± 6.8 for the non-melanoma cases and melanoma cases, respectively. The computer assisted counts calculated the average spindle cell composition rate for non-melanoma and melanoma cases to be 4.53 ± 2.43% and 23.04 ± 9.65%, respectively.

 
Conclusions
 

Automated digital methods can identify, quantify, and characterize spindle cells in an ocular FNAB cytopathology slide. Such automated system may be used to identify melanoma cases that could be verified by an expert cytopathologist at a remote site. Use of this computer assisted diagnostic tool can potentially be expanded for cytopathologic assessment of other tumors.

 
 
Figure 1. Manual count training of cell and spindle cells. (A) Large field-of-view image comprised of 41,412 um2 > field-of-view (15 grids) at 0.185 um/pixel resolution. (B) Magnified view of single grid with manual cell counts (cyan dots) and spindle counts (red dots). (C) Analysis output from CAD algorithm associated to manual counts tile in B with cell counts (green dots) and spindle counts (red outline).
 
Figure 1. Manual count training of cell and spindle cells. (A) Large field-of-view image comprised of 41,412 um2 > field-of-view (15 grids) at 0.185 um/pixel resolution. (B) Magnified view of single grid with manual cell counts (cyan dots) and spindle counts (red dots). (C) Analysis output from CAD algorithm associated to manual counts tile in B with cell counts (green dots) and spindle counts (red outline).
 
Keywords: 589 melanoma • 639 pathology techniques • 624 oncology  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×