April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
In vivo evaluation of hyaluronic acid based in situ hydrogel for prolonged release of Avastin by intravitreal injection
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ying Chau
    Division of Biomedical Engineering, Hong Kong Univ of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
    Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Hong Kong Univ of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • Yu Yu
    Division of Biomedical Engineering, Hong Kong Univ of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • Laurence Lau
    Eye Institute, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • Amy CY Lo
    Eye Institute, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Ying Chau, PCT/CN2012/000827 (P); Yu Yu, PCT/CN2012/000827 (P); Laurence Lau, None; Amy Lo, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 5261. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ying Chau, Yu Yu, Laurence Lau, Amy CY Lo; In vivo evaluation of hyaluronic acid based in situ hydrogel for prolonged release of Avastin by intravitreal injection. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):5261.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

To evaluate the biocompatibility and 6 months in vivo release of Avastin from a hyaluronic acid based in situ hydrogel after intravitreal injection in rabbit eye.

 
Methods
 

The in situ hydrogel is formed by the chemical crosslinking of two polymer solutions, the vinylsulfonate hyaluronic acid (HA-VS) and thiolated dextran (Dex-SH) using catalyst-free click chemistry in aqueous phase (Yu and Chau 2012). The pH 7.4 buffered HA-VS, Dex-SH and Avastin were mixed on ice and injected to the vitreous of rabbits with 30 G needle. The biocompatibility was evaluated by binocular indirect ophthalmoscope (BIO), full-field ERG and histology at various time points from 1 week to 3 months. The concentrations of both total and active Avastin in rabbit vitreous were determined by ELISA assay.

 
Results
 

A transparent gel is seen in the vitreous after injection. The low viscosity of the mixture made injection easy even through 30G needle, and the fast gelation at body temperature (<10 seconds) ensure almost immediately gelation after injection. BIO images, ERG and histology showed that the gel does not induce hemorrhage, retinal detachment, inflammation or other gross pathological changes in rabbit eye after injection (figure 1). While the bolus intravitreal injection of native Avastin follows the first order elimination kinetics in rabbit eye, the in situ gel formation was able to extend the retention of Avastin in rabbit eye above therapeutic concentration for at least 6 months (figure 2). The concentration of Avastin 3 months and 6 months after injection was 100 and 109 times higher than bolus injection after the same period of time.

 
Conclusions
 

The new in situ hydrogel formulation of Avastin was transparent, biocompatible and able to prolong the retention of drug in rabbit eye in vivo for at least 6 months.

 
 
Figure 1 Biocompatibility of hydrogel examined with BIO (A), histology (B), retinal layer thickness from histology (C), showed only 3-month post injection group. (D) Full-filed ERG, showed only dark adapted B wave group.
 
Figure 1 Biocompatibility of hydrogel examined with BIO (A), histology (B), retinal layer thickness from histology (C), showed only 3-month post injection group. (D) Full-filed ERG, showed only dark adapted B wave group.
 
 
Figure 2 Concentration of Avastin in rabbit eye at different time points after injection of in situ gel formulation. The value is compared with bolus injection simulated based on published data (Bakri 2007, Nomoto 2009, Sinapis 2011).
 
Figure 2 Concentration of Avastin in rabbit eye at different time points after injection of in situ gel formulation. The value is compared with bolus injection simulated based on published data (Bakri 2007, Nomoto 2009, Sinapis 2011).
 
Keywords: 748 vascular endothelial growth factor • 763 vitreous • 561 injection  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×