April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Randomized Clinical Trial Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Preservative-free Tafluprost And Preservative-free Timolol In Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma (OAG) Or Ocular Hypertension (OHT) In India
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Almira Chabi
    Merck, North Wales, PA
  • Robert Lupinacci
    Merck, North Wales, PA
  • Christine Baranak
    Merck, North Wales, PA
  • W. Joseph Herring
    Merck, North Wales, PA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Almira Chabi, Merck & Co., Inc. (E); Robert Lupinacci, Merck & Co., Inc. (E); Christine Baranak, Merck & Co., Inc. (E); W. Joseph Herring, Merck & Co., Inc. (E)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 549. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Almira Chabi, Robert Lupinacci, Christine Baranak, W. Joseph Herring; Randomized Clinical Trial Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Preservative-free Tafluprost And Preservative-free Timolol In Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma (OAG) Or Ocular Hypertension (OHT) In India. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):549.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Prostaglandin analogs are frequently first-line IOP-lowering therapy in patients with OAG and OHT. Most topical ocular hypotensives contain the preservative benzalkonium chloride, which may be associated with decreased ocular tolerability in some patients. We compared the efficacy and safety of tafluprost, a preservative-free (PF) prostaglandin analog, with PF timolol in India.

Methods: Randomized, double-masked, Phase III clinical trial (NCT01254604) in patients with OAG and OHT. After discontinuation and washout of existing ocular hypotensive treatment, patients who had IOP ≥24 and ≤36 mmHg in at least 1 eye at the 0800 hr time point were randomized 1:1 to 4 weeks of treatment with either PF tafluprost (PF TAF) 0.0015% or PF timolol (PF TIM) 0.5%. IOP was measured 3 times during the day (0800, 1000, 1600 hrs) at baseline and weeks 2 and 4. The primary hypothesis was that PF TAF would be non-inferior to PF TIM in mean diurnal IOP change from baseline to week 4. The study was powered for a non-inferiority margin of 1.5 mmHg.

Results: A total of 190 patients were randomized and 173 completed (PF TAF = 95, 87 and PF TIM = 95, 86 respectively). Baseline diurnal mean IOPs were 24.8 mmHg in the PF TAF group and 24.9 mmHg in the PF TIM group. IOPs at week 4 decreased a mean of -8.3 mmHg (95% CI ranged between -9.0 and -7.6) for PF TAF and decreased a mean of -6.6 mmHg (95% CI ranged between -7.3 and -5.9) for PF TIM. At weeks 2 and 4, the upper limits of the 2-sided 95% CIs for the difference between treatments in IOP-lowering were less than the pre-specified non-inferiority margin. In fact, the CIs were < 0 at both weeks 2 and 4 suggesting PF TAF superiority to PF TIM with respect to diurnal IOP change from baseline. The percentages of PF TAF and PF TIM patients reporting ocular pain/stinging/irritation and pruritus were (6.5% vs. 5.3%; nominal p=0.742) and (7.5% vs. 3.2%; nominal p=0.188) respectively. The percentages of PF TAF and PF TIM patients reporting conjunctival hyperemia (determined by aggregation of all terms suggestive of conjunctival hyperemia) were 9.7% vs. 4.3% (nominal p=0.145).

Conclusions: The IOP-lowering effect of PF tafluprost was non-inferior to that of PF timolol. PF tafluprost is an efficacious and generally well-tolerated ocular hypotensive agent.

Keywords: 568 intraocular pressure • 466 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: treatment/prevention assessment/controlled clinical trials  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×