April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Surgical outreach eye programs: a comparison of community-based vs. hospital-based cataract surgery delivery
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sushant Wagley
    College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
  • Emily Cole
    Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
  • Badri Badhu
    Ophthalmology, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal
  • Manoj Sharma
    Ophthalmology, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Dili, Timor-Leste
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Sushant Wagley, None; Emily Cole, None; Badri Badhu, None; Manoj Sharma, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 5556. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sushant Wagley, Emily Cole, Badri Badhu, Manoj Sharma; Surgical outreach eye programs: a comparison of community-based vs. hospital-based cataract surgery delivery. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):5556.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: To compare systems indicators and delivery methods for community-based vs. hospital-based surgical outreach eye programs conducted by various eye care institutions in Nepal over a year.

Methods: Programmatic data from 18 community-based and 8 hospital-based eye camps conducted through various eye care institutions in Nepal were analyzed for systems and delivery indicators including: the total number and type of camps, number and type of healthcare provider present at each camp, total number of patients screened, total number of surgeries performed, number and type of cataract surgeries/non-cataract procedures performed, and post operative follow-up protocol utilized by each institution.

Results: From the 26 eye camps included in this sample, 16784 patients were screened for eye pathologies and 2330 received cataract removal - with a majority (98.39%) getting PC-IOL implantation. There was no significant difference in the number of males and females treated at these camps. The total number of ophthalmologists at the various eye care institutions ranged from 2 to 25, however, usually only one ophthalmologist was present at each eye camp. Average team size was 10 at community-based surgical camp vs. 8 at hospital-based surgical camps. Average follow up ranged from 1 to 30 days post-operative care, with 65.3% of the programs conducting only one-day post-operative follow-up care.

Conclusions: Eye care institutions in Nepal organized more hospital-based surgical outreach eye programs than community-based surgical camps per year. Both types of camps effectively screened and operated on a large numbers of patients. Clinical protocols and systems delivery protocols utilized to carry out the hospital-based vs. community-based eye camps did not differ between institutions. Further studies analyzing financial data and resource utilization for surgical outreach eye programs are necessary to increase cataract surgery coverage in resource limited settings throughout the world.

Keywords: 460 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: health care delivery/economics/manpower • 465 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques  

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.