April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Morbidity and Mortality Conference Using an Anonymous Audience Response System to Address Core Competencies in Ophthalmology
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jessica Prince
    Ophthalmology, Montefiore Med Ctr/Albert Einstein, Bronx, NY
  • Lewis A Eisen
    Critical Care, Montefiore Med Ctr/Albert Einstein, Bronx, NY
  • Jamie B Rosenberg
    Ophthalmology, Montefiore Med Ctr/Albert Einstein, Bronx, NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Jessica Prince, None; Lewis Eisen, None; Jamie Rosenberg, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 5575. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jessica Prince, Lewis A Eisen, Jamie B Rosenberg; Morbidity and Mortality Conference Using an Anonymous Audience Response System to Address Core Competencies in Ophthalmology. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):5575.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: To assess whether implementation of Morbidity and Mortality (M&M) conferences with anonymous audience response system enhances residency education in the ACGME core competencies.

Methods: Every other month starting June 2013, an M&M conference was held for the ophthalmology department. Residents presented patients who had suffered morbidity such as vision loss or unexpected need for reoperation. In each presentation, the level of training (student, resident, fellow, attending) was asked, followed by 5-7 multiple choice questions throughout the presentation addressing one of the 6 core competencies. All questions were powered by www.polleverywhere.com, which allowed each participant to respond by text message and displayed all responses anonymously. The poll responses were discussed in real time, including a determination of which core competency was applicable. The last question in each presentation asked audience members if this format of M&M conference was useful. The responses were collected and analyzed.

Results: Three cases were presented during two conferences using audience response polling software. During the case discussions, the following issues were addressed: appropriate patient follow-up, diagnostic evaluations, complete ophthalmologic examinations, surgical errors, and post-operative complications. The questions addressed all 6 core competencies: patient care, medical knowledge, practice based learning and improvement, systems based practice, professionalism, and interpersonal skills and communication. Sixteen people attended the first conference and fifteen people attended the second. Most audience members (54.8%) were residents, with medical students (25.8%), fellows (3.2%), and attending physicians (16.1%) also participating. The majority of participants (84.6%) agreed or strongly agreed that the format of the M&M conference was useful.

Conclusions: M&M conferences play an integral role in residency education. Anonymous audience response systems can provide a method of addressing all core competencies in a way that promotes active participation.

Keywords: 579 learning • 462 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: outcomes/complications • 465 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques  

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.