April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Reliability of Smartphone-Based Electronic Visual Acuity Testing: (Applications in Remote Monitoring and Clinical Research of Macular Pathology)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Seung-Young Yu
    Ophthalmology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Ji Ho Yang
    Ophthalmology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Yonguk Kim
    Ophthalmology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Hyung-Woo Kwak
    Ophthalmology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Mark Blumenkranz
    Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Seung-Young Yu, None; Ji Ho Yang, None; Yonguk Kim, None; Hyung-Woo Kwak, None; Mark Blumenkranz, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 5598. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Seung-Young Yu, Ji Ho Yang, Yonguk Kim, Hyung-Woo Kwak, Mark Blumenkranz; Reliability of Smartphone-Based Electronic Visual Acuity Testing: (Applications in Remote Monitoring and Clinical Research of Macular Pathology). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):5598.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To assess the feasibility and accuracy of a smartphone-based electronic method of visual acuity (VA) testing for remote monitoring and clinical research, and to evaluate its test-retest reliability and concordance with standard Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) testing.

Methods: Visual Acuity was measured with the smartphone-based electronic visual acuity (SEVA) testing algorithm (SightBookTM, DigiSight Technologies, Inc. Portola Valley, CA) at a test distance of 30 centimeters, twice, and both ETDRS distance chart and LEA numbers near vision chart, once, on one eye of each of 69 normal, 35 cataract, 55 diabetic, and 41 age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients (n=200). Reliability and concordance were calculated using the Bland-Altman limits of agreement, the coefficient of repeatability (COR), and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: For the SEVA testing, test-retest reliability was high (ICCs= 0.977 of all patients, 0.980 of normal subjects, 0.957 of AMD, 0.966 of cataract, 0.970 of DR; 95% limits of agreement ± 0.20 logMAR). SEVA and near VA with LEA numbers chart were highly correlated (r2=0.671 of initial test in SEVA; r2=0.714 of repeated test in SEVA). There were no differences between SEVA and near VA with LEA numbers in all diseases and visual acuity groups. SEVA and distance VA by ETDRS were highly correlated (r2=0.757 of initial test in SEVA; r2=0.746 of repeated test in SEVA). There were no differences between VA with SEVA and distance VA with the ETDRS chart in all diseases and VA groups except the AMD group (p=0.003).

Conclusions: Smartphone-based electronic VA testing using the SightBookTM application has high test-retest reliability and good concordance with ETDRS distance visual acuity and standard near vision testing.

Keywords: 754 visual acuity • 414 aging: visual performance  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×