April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Comparing the subjective and the objective severity of affections observed at emergency room in ophthalmology
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Aurelie Pison
    Ophthalmology, Pole Hotel-Dieu Cochin, site Hotel-Dieu, Sorbonne Paris Cité university, Paris Descartes School of medicine, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France
  • Pierre Raphael Rothschild
    Ophthalmology, Pole Hotel-Dieu Cochin, site Hotel-Dieu, Sorbonne Paris Cité university, Paris Descartes School of medicine, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France
    Team 17, INSERM UMRS 872, CIC des Cordeliers, Paris, France
  • Chadi Mehanna
    Ophthalmology, Pole Hotel-Dieu Cochin, site Hotel-Dieu, Sorbonne Paris Cité university, Paris Descartes School of medicine, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France
  • Antoine P Brezin
    Ophthalmology, Pole Hotel-Dieu Cochin, site Hotel-Dieu, Sorbonne Paris Cité university, Paris Descartes School of medicine, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France
  • Jean-Louis Bourges
    Ophthalmology, Pole Hotel-Dieu Cochin, site Hotel-Dieu, Sorbonne Paris Cité university, Paris Descartes School of medicine, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France
    Team 17, INSERM UMRS 872, CIC des Cordeliers, Paris, France
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Aurelie Pison, None; Pierre Raphael Rothschild, None; Chadi Mehanna, None; Antoine Brezin, None; Jean-Louis Bourges, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 6101. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Aurelie Pison, Pierre Raphael Rothschild, Chadi Mehanna, Antoine P Brezin, Jean-Louis Bourges; Comparing the subjective and the objective severity of affections observed at emergency room in ophthalmology. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):6101.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: The triage process at ophthalmological emergencies (OER) evaluates the severity of ocular conditions. However, the concept of severity is imprecise, and differently approached. We compared the subjective severity perceived by patients and the objective evaluation of severity provided by physicians. A pilot study conducted retrospectively over 6 months on 3003 patients revealed that patients tended underestimating the severity of their affection. We aimed to investigate that discrepancy prospectively.

Methods: Both patients and physicians were enrolled to quantify the severity of the ocular condition referred to OER over two months (July and October 2013). A nurse collected patient’s subjective score of ocular condition severity from 0 (no severity) to 6 (maximal) and graded patient’s behavior from 0 (normal) to 5 (violent or highly incoherent). After examination, the ophthalmologist provided an objective severity score for the same ocular condition. Data were analyzed prospectively and anonymously.

Results: We collected 4478 forms of which 78 % were correctly completed both by the nurse and the physician (n=3486). The average age of the patients was 43.58 years (43.02 to 44.14; IC 95%). Half of the patients displayed a normal behavior (score 0; n=2227). The mean behavior score was 0.553. Only one patient scored 5. The severity couldn't be scored by 755 patients (17%). Patients scored severity as none, minor, moderate, serious, severe, critical or maximal in 682, 1296, 1018, 530, 111, 16, and 4 cases, and by ophthalmologists in 1553, 624, 1159, 634, 296, 87 and 47 cases, respectively. The severity was scored identically both by the ophthalmologist and the patient in 20 % of the cases (293, 180, 299, 86, 19, 2 and 0 cases respectively). The subjective score was lower than the objective for 300 patients and higher for 75 patients .

Conclusions: The trend of the pilot study is prospectively confirmed .The severity of ocular affections seen at OER is differently scored by patients or by ophthalmologists, and tend to be underestimated by patients. Half of the patients modified their behavior due to their ocular condition.

Keywords: 460 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: health care delivery/economics/manpower • 462 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: outcomes/complications • 742 trauma  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×