April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Long term outcome of patients with Plateau Iris Configuration
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jonathan M Schulhof
    Department of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
  • Janet B Serle
    Department of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Jonathan Schulhof, None; Janet Serle, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 6151. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jonathan M Schulhof, Janet B Serle; Long term outcome of patients with Plateau Iris Configuration. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):6151.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: To examine the long term outcome of patients with Plateau Iris Configuration

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients presenting for glaucoma follow-up over a one year period. Inclusion criteria were a minimum of 24 months follow-up, and a diagnosis of Plateau Iris Configuration as determined by JBS via clinical gonioscopic exam and/or ultrasound biomicroscopy. The charts were then reviewed for exam on presentation, subsequent visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), need for laser iridotomy (LI) and/or laser iridoplasty, need for glaucoma surgery, need for IOP lowering and/or miotic eyedrops, progression of optic nerve cupping, and development of peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS).

Results: 26 eyes of 13 patients satisfied the criteria and were included in the study. Mean follow-up time was 6.4 years (2.1 - 16.0). 22 eyes of 11 patients were still phakic at the time of our study, and all maintained vision within 1 line or better compared with initial presentation. 100% of eyes underwent LI at least once, with 1/26 (3.8%) requiring a repeat LI due to iridotomy closure. 5/26 eyes (19.2%) of 3 patients progressed to Plateau Iris Syndrome defined as elevated IOP with narrow or closed angles despite LI, and all 5 underwent peripheral iridoplasty. Only 4/26 eyes (15.4%) of 2 patients required IOP lowering eyedrops to maintain IOP <21. While 8/26 phakic eyes (30.8%) were treated with pilocarpine, 4 of those 8 eyes subsequently underwent cataract extraction, and were successfully tapered off miotics. 0/26 eyes required filtration or drainage implant surgery, and 26/26 showed stable cup to disc ratio within 0.1 from initial exam. 3/26 eyes (2 patients) showed presence of PAS on initial exam, and only 2/24 remaining eyes (8.3%, 1 patient) showed development of PAS over the course of treatment.

Conclusions: Our current series demonstrates that a majority of patients Plateau Iris Configuration treated with LI alone were able to maintain normal IOP while avoiding sequelae of chronic angle-closure. Eyedrops and iridoplasty were only required in a minority of patients, and in all cases excellent vision was maintained without significant structural or glaucomatous damage.

Keywords: 461 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: natural history • 571 iris • 712 shape and contour  

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.