April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
An Alarming and Practical Case of Compromised Color Constancy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Javid Sadr
    Psychology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Javid Sadr, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 6241. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Javid Sadr; An Alarming and Practical Case of Compromised Color Constancy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):6241.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: High-level color perception isn't a simple product of cone activity; it derives from broader analyses concerning the illuminant, surface reflectance properties, and context. The perceptual phenomenon of color constancy nicely demonstrates our ability to negotiate variable lighting and maintain "correct" color percepts, even when "correct" does not mean veridical in terms of received wavelengths. Certain manipulations, however, can disrupt color constancy, and in an important and potentially dangerous real-world application we hypothesized that the extreme filtering properties of colored translucent containers (specifically, common medical prescription bottles) would result in gross misperception of colored items within (i.e., prescription pills).

Methods: Subjects performed a series of color perception tasks not limited to basic verbal color identification; these included: free color-naming of individually-presented colored item samples in clear (control) vs yellow-tinted containers; free color-naming of multiple samples of colored items in a gallery (allowing simultaneous comparison across containers); color-matching, pairing colored samples in yellow-tinted containers with a gallery of reference samples in clear containers; "same"/"different" comparison between pairs of samples in yellow-tinted containers and reference samples in clear containers; and a combined color-naming / color-counting task given containers with multiple/mixed color samples (allowing simultaneous comparison within each container).

Results: As predicted, compared to colored items in clear (control/reference) containers, for which all forms of testing yielded at-ceiling correct performance, the same colored items presented in yellow-tinted containers were identified, matched, compared, and counted incorrectly with incredible frequency. For example: in free color-naming, correct identification fell as low as 15% for the pink samples; in paired same/different comparisons, incorrect matching of, e.g., purple and green samples occurred in 73% of trials -- 93% for yellow and white; with mixed-color samples, the mixture of orange and pink items, or of yellow and white items, was almost universally perceived as a homogenous sample.

Conclusions: Our results reveal profound deficits in color perception caused by common translucent containers, with direct and alarming translation to the real-world potential for very hazardous pharmaceutical errors.

Keywords: 641 perception • 469 color appearance/constancy  

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.