April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
QUANTITATVE EVALUATION OF EPLERENONE TREATMENT FOR CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY (CSCR)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Agustina Palacio
    Ophthalmology and visual Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
  • Niloofar Piri
    Ophthalmology and visual Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
  • Ahmet Ozkok
    Ophthalmology and visual Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
  • Shlomit Schaal
    Ophthalmology and visual Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
  • Tongalp H Tezel
    Ophthalmology and visual Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
    Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Agustina Palacio, None; Niloofar Piri, None; Ahmet Ozkok, None; Shlomit Schaal, None; Tongalp Tezel, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 6377. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Agustina Palacio, Niloofar Piri, Ahmet Ozkok, Shlomit Schaal, Tongalp H Tezel; QUANTITATVE EVALUATION OF EPLERENONE TREATMENT FOR CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY (CSCR). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):6377.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To determine the effect of mineralocorticod receptor antagonist eplerenone (Inspra®; Pfizer, NY) in the treatment for CSCR.

Methods: Pre- and serial post treatment HD-OCT scans with EDI cuts were obtained from five CSCR patients treated with 50 mg/day of eplerenone. OCT scans were analyzed morphometrically to determine the change in the amount of the subretinal serous fluid. Clinical and morphometric data was compared with a control group of five untreated CSCR patients having similar age (55±12 vs. 49±20, p=0.84), gender (p=1.0), initial logMAR visual acuity (0.29±0.16 vs. 0.21±0.16, p=0.42), duration of symptoms (113±111 vs. 80±156 days, p=0.55) and central macular thickness (415±81 vs. 387±84 microns, p=0.55). Also, the impact of eplerenone on choroidal vasculature was estimated by calculating “Choroidal Perfusion Index” (CPI) which is defined as the ratio of the choroidal vascular area to the total choroidal area underneath the serous elevation.

Results: Eplerenone treatment caused significant regression of the subretinal fluid which reflected itself by a decrease in the central macular thickness (415±80 vs. 271±28 microns, p=0.02) and total serous fluid area (0.77±0.88 vs. 0.14±0.22, p=0.03), in contrast to observation group which remained the same (central macular thickness = 388±84 mm2 vs.339±84 microns, p=0.35; total serous fluid area = 0.60±0.39 vs. 40±0.74 mm2, p=0.7). The resolution rate of the subretinal fluid was three time higher in the eplerenone group (33±16% vs. 10±25%). Resolution of the subretinal fluid was accompanied with a an increase in CPI (1.7±1.3). Despite better anatomical outcome, the impact of eplerenone treatment on logMAR visual acuity was similar in both groups (3 improved and 2 stable vs. 2 improved, 2 stable, 1 worsened, p=0.55). Treatment with eplerenone was well tolerated in all patients without serious adverse effects.

Conclusions: Eplerenone speeds up the resolution of the subretinal fluid in CSCR. However, it is not effective to relieve the choroidal congestion, nor has an impact on final visual acuity.

Keywords: 688 retina • 585 macula/fovea • 550 imaging/image analysis: clinical  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×