April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
How does ageing affect visual short-term memory for identifying objects in their spatial locations?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Shahina Pardhan
    Vision and Eye Research Unit (VERU), Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Raju Sapkota
    Vision and Eye Research Unit (VERU), Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Ian van der Linde
    Vision and Eye Research Unit (VERU), Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Computing and Technology, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Shahina Pardhan, None; Raju Sapkota, None; Ian van der Linde, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 779. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Shahina Pardhan, Raju Sapkota, Ian van der Linde; How does ageing affect visual short-term memory for identifying objects in their spatial locations?. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):779.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: It has been shown that normal aging reduces the ability to remember an object’s visual features such as its colour and shape when presented for short durations. We examined the effects of aging on visual short term memory (VSTM) for complex visual tasks that require participants to remember both the object and its spatial location (object-location binding).

Methods: Two experiments were conducted: object recall and location identification. Seventeen young (mean age =23.3 years), and 17 normally ageing subjects (mean age=66.5 years) participated. In experiment 1, the ‘memory display’ comprised two or four Snodgrass stimuli (memory loads ML2 and ML4 respectively). These were presented sequentially, for 650ms, at random locations on a screen followed by a 1000ms blank interval, and then the presentation of a ‘test display’. The test display used a spatial marker to cue one of the previously shown stimuli locations. Participants were asked to report which target had been shown at that particular spatial location. In experiment 2, the memory display was similar to experiment 1, but in the test display one of the previously displayed objects was shown as a test target. All the possible spatial locations were also displayed, each identified by a numbered marker. Participants were asked to report the spatial location at which the target object had been shown in the memory display.

Results: The percentage correct responses were analysed using 2 × 2 mixed ANOVA. Older subjects showed a significantly lower performance compared to younger subjects (Experiment 1: F(1,32)=27.41, p<0.001; Experiment 2: F(1,32)=13.49, p=0.001). Posthoc analysis showed that, in the first experiment (object recall), older participants showed a significantly (p<0.01) lower performance of 10% and 24% with ML2 and ML4 respectively, compared to younger subjects. In experiment 2 (location identification), older subjects’ performance decreased significantly (p<0.05) by 4% and 17% for ML2 and ML4 respectively, compared to younger subjects.

Conclusions: Older subjects have reduced VSTM capacity for tasks that require object-location binding. This is apparent even with relatively small memory loads.

Keywords: 413 aging • 591 memory  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×