April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Water Content of Soft-Contact-Lens-Material Hydrogels
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Thomas J. Dursch
    Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
  • Frank Nguyen
    Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
  • Teresa Sells
    Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
  • Yoobin Oh
    Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
  • John M Prausnitz
    Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
  • Clayton J Radke
    Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
    Vision Science Group, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Thomas Dursch, None; Frank Nguyen, None; Teresa Sells, None; Yoobin Oh, None; John Prausnitz, None; Clayton Radke, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 861. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Thomas J. Dursch, Frank Nguyen, Teresa Sells, Yoobin Oh, John M Prausnitz, Clayton J Radke; Water Content of Soft-Contact-Lens-Material Hydrogels. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):861.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

SCL wear comfort is dictated, in part, by hydrogel mechanical and transport properties that depend strongly on water uptake (e.g., lubricity, elasticity, and oxygen/ion/water permeability). Accordingly, an essential feature of SCLs is their equilibrium water volume fraction,φ1. We present a method to predict φ1 of both HEMA-based and silicone-based SCL hydrogels that compares well with experiment.

 
Methods
 

Water uptake of HEMA/MAA, Si/HEMA, and Si/MAA hydrogels was determined gravimetrically for varying copolymer composition. Prior to measurement, hydrogels were swollen for a minimum of 3 d in pH = 7.4 0.02 M phosphate buffer saline solutions (0.15 M NaCl). Water content was predicted using a multicomponent Flory-Rehner-Donnan theory modified to account for specific complexation of water with charged carboxylic groups of MAA, along with charge-dependent binding of salt counterions.

 
Results
 

Fig. 1 graphs water volume fraction, denoted φ1,hyphil, against MAA-copolymer volume fraction during synthesis, νMAA, for HEMA/MAA hydrogels. The solid line is drawn using theory with no adjustable constants. At pH = 7.4, addition of MAA to the hydrogel increases water content primarily through hydration of charged MAA carboxylic groups. Small MAA amounts increase water uptake dramatically, but less so as MAA copolymer fraction increases. Fig. 2 displays water volume fraction, φ1, for Si/MAA and Si/HEMA hydrogels with varying copolymer composition (i.e., MAA or HEMA volume fraction, denoted νhyphil). φ1 increases monotonically with increasing νhyphil, as expected. Hydrophobic silicone moieties uptake negligible water. Consequently, we propose that φ1 for silicone-based hydrogels is simply the volume-fraction-weighted water content of the hydrophilic domains, or φ1= νhyphil φ1,hyphil (solid lines). In both cases, agreement between experiment and theory is excellent.

 
Conclusions
 

We developed a new procedure to quantify equilibrium water uptake of SCL-material hydrogels. Our procedure permits estimation of SCL water content without resort to experiment. To our knowledge, this study is the first attempt to predict water uptake of silicone-based hydrogels.

 
 
Fig. 1. Water volume fraction, φ1,hyphil, versus MAA-copolymer volume fraction, νMAA, for the HEMA/MAA hydrogels.
 
Fig. 1. Water volume fraction, φ1,hyphil, versus MAA-copolymer volume fraction, νMAA, for the HEMA/MAA hydrogels.
 
 
Fig. 2. Water volume fraction, φ1, versus hydrophilic-phase volume fraction (i.e., HEMA or MAA), νhyphil, for the silicone-based hydrogels.
 
Fig. 2. Water volume fraction, φ1, versus hydrophilic-phase volume fraction (i.e., HEMA or MAA), νhyphil, for the silicone-based hydrogels.
 
Keywords: 477 contact lens  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×