April 2014
Volume 55, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
Higher-Order Aberrations after Endothelial Keratoplasty: Comparison of DMEK and “thin” DSAEK
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Julia C Talajic
    Ophthalmology, Devers Eye Institute, Portland, OR
  • Cor van Zyl
    Ophthalmology, Devers Eye Institute, Portland, OR
  • Michael D Straiko
    Ophthalmology, Devers Eye Institute, Portland, OR
  • Zachary Mayko
    Ophthalmology, Devers Eye Institute, Portland, OR
    Lions VisionGift, Portland, OR
  • Mark A Terry
    Ophthalmology, Devers Eye Institute, Portland, OR
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Julia Talajic, None; Cor van Zyl, None; Michael Straiko, None; Zachary Mayko, None; Mark Terry, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 892. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Julia C Talajic, Cor van Zyl, Michael D Straiko, Zachary Mayko, Mark A Terry; Higher-Order Aberrations after Endothelial Keratoplasty: Comparison of DMEK and “thin” DSAEK. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(13):892.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To compare higher-order aberrations (HOA) following DMEK and “thin” DSAEK. These HOA will also be compared to those of normal corneas.

Methods: 34 eyes underwent DMEK and 30 eyes underwent DSAEK for Fuchs dystrophy. 30 eyes undergoing cataract surgery were used for controls. DSAEK graft thickness was measured 6 months or later postoperatively with anterior segment OCT (Visante OCT, Anterior Segment Imaging). Grafts measured post operatively were identified to be 100 microns or thinner. The root mean squared (RMS) obtained with the Pentacam (Oculus, Arlington, USA) 6 months postoperatively were compared between groups. That is, the mean RMS of the total cornea, the front of the cornea, the back of the cornea, and back corneal spherical aberration RMS were compared.

Results: The mean total RMS and front corneal RMS was not different between groups. The back corneal RMS was .25 for DMEK, .43 for thin DSAEK, and .25 for controls. The difference between DMEK and the thin DSAEK group was statistically significant (p = .0001), as was the difference between the thin DSAEK group and the controls (p = .0005). The difference between DMEK and controls was not statistically significant (p = .96). The mean RMS for back corneal spherical aberration was -0.17 for DMEK, -0.23 for thin DSAEK, and -0.17 for controls. The difference between DMEK and controls was not significant (p=.99), however, it was of borderline significance when comparing the other groups (DMEK vs. thin DSAEK, p = .07; thin DSAEK vs. controls, p = .12).

Conclusions: Higher-order aberrations of the back cornea in DMEK eyes were equivalent to those in control eyes. There were less aberrations in DMEK eyes compared to “thin” DSAEK.

Keywords: 481 cornea: endothelium • 741 transplantation • 479 cornea: clinical science  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×